SynthesisArchives of endocrinology and metabolism2023
Cardiorespiratory fitness in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Archives of endocrinology and metabolism, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Complexity of Cardiovascular Regulation and Its Association with Physical and Cardiorespiratory Fitness in Men with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Measurement Properties of the Modified Incremental Step Test for Assessing Exercise Capacity in Individuals With Type 2 Diabetes.Physiotherapy research international : the journal for researchers and clinicians in physical therapy · 2026Article
- Determinants of Maximal Oxygen Consumption in Cardiac Rehabilitation Patients: The Role of Sex.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Correlation between cardiorespiratory fitness and body composition in individuals with different glucose metabolism statuses.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2026Article
- Metabolic signatures of the integrated profile of cardiovascular autonomic modulation and cardiorespiratory fitness in apparently healthy individuals.Physiological reports · 2026Article
- Fitness parameters as a marker of cardiac autonomic neuropathy among diabetes mellitus patients.Bioinformation · 2026Article
- Independent influence of type 2 diabetes on reduced cardiopulmonary fitness in patients after percutaneous coronary intervention: a cross-sectional study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Aerobic exercise as a non-pharmacological intervention for improving metabolic and hemodynamic profiles in type 2 diabetes.Irish journal of medical science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) among individuals with and without type 2 diabetes. Materials and methods: The current review was registered in PROSPERO under the number CRD42018082718. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases were searched from inception through February 2022. Eligibility criteria consisted of observational or interventional studies that evaluated CRF through cardiopulmonary exercise testing or six-minute walk test in individuals with type 2 diabetes compared with individuals without type 2 diabetes. For data extraction, we used baseline CRF assessments of randomized clinical trials or follow-up CRF assessments in observational studies. We performed a meta-analysis using maximal oxygen consumption (VO Results: Out of 8,347 studies retrieved, 77 were included. Compared with individuals without type 2 diabetes, individuals with diabetes achieved a lower VO Conclusion: Type 2 diabetes was associated with lower cardiorespiratory fitness, as observed by lower VO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.