Observational studyIndian heart journal
Two-year clinical outcomes of drug-coated balloon angioplasty and angiographic predictors of restenosis among patients with de novo femoropopliteal lesions.
Observational study in Indian heart journal. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesWe analyzed the 2-year clinical outcomes of patients with de novo femoropopliteal (FP) lesions who underwent drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty and the angiographic predictors of restenosis.
methodsThis single-center, retrospective, and observational study evaluated 129 de novo FP lesions treated with DCB angioplasty without bailout stenting. Clinical outcomes and risk factors for loss of primary patency were analyzed using univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models.
resultsThe participants were aged 48-93 (mean: 73.6 ± 9.8) years, and 31% were women. Approximately 33% of the patients were receiving regular dialysis, and 35% of the affected limbs had critical ischemia. The mean lesion length was 132 ± 96 mm, and the mean reference vessel diameter (RVD) was 4.7 ± 0.8 mm. Forty-three (33%) limbs had chronic total occlusion of the target artery segment. Fifty-seven (44%) and 72 (56%) lesions were treated with DCB angioplasty using IN.PACT Admiral and Lutonix, respectively. The primary patency and amputation-free survival at 2 years were 59.3% and 89.5%, respectively. RVD was found to be an independent predictor of loss of primary patency. Based on the receiver operating characteristic analysis, an RVD of 4.2 mm was the best predictor of loss of primary patency at 2 years.
conclusionsThe short-term clinical outcome of DCB angioplasty for de novo FP lesions was acceptable. Moreover, an RVD of <4.2 mm was an independent predictor of restenosis after DCB angioplasty.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.