Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37740221›Full record

Trial reportStem cell research & therapy2023

Effect of once versus twice intracoronary injection of allogeneic-derived mesenchymal stromal cells after acute myocardial infarction: BOOSTER-TAHA7 randomized clinical trial.

Armin Attar, Mohsen Farjoud Kouhanjani, Kamran Hessami, Massoud Vosough, Javad Kojuri, Mani Ramzi, Seyed Ali Hosseini, Marjan Faghih, Ahmad Monabati

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in Stem cell research & therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 25 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 7 pooled it
16.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Trial
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Armin AttarDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, TAHA Clinical Trial Group, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Zand Street, Shiraz, 71344-1864, Iran. attar_armin@yahoo.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4133-4870
Mohsen Farjoud KouhanjaniSchool of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Kamran HessamiSchool of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Massoud VosoughDepartment of Regenerative Medicine, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran.
Javad KojuriDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Mani RamziHematopathology and Molecular Pathology Service, Department of Pathology, Hematology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, 71344-1864, Iran.
Seyed Ali HosseiniSchool of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
Marjan FaghihDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.
Ahmad MonabatiHematopathology and Molecular Pathology Service, Department of Pathology, Hematology Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, 71344-1864, Iran. monabati.am@gmail.com.
Shiraz University of Medical Sciences · IRArak University of Medical Sciences · IRRoyan Institute · IR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) transplantation can improve the left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Transplanted MSCs exert a paracrine effect, which might be augmented if repeated doses are administered. This study aimed to compare the effects of single versus double transplantation of Wharton's jelly MSCs (WJ-MSCs) on LVEF post-AMI.

methodsWe conducted a single-blind, randomized, multicenter trial. After 3-7 days of an AMI treated successfully by primary PCI, 70 patients younger than 65 with LVEF < 40% on baseline echocardiography were randomized to receive conventional care, a single intracoronary infusion of WJ-MSCs, or a repeated infusion 10 days later. The primary endpoint was the 6-month LVEF improvement as per cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging.

resultsThe mean baseline EF measured by CMR was similar (~ 40%) in all three groups. By the end of the trial, while all patients experienced a rise in EF, the most significant change was seen in the repeated intervention group. Compared to the control group (n = 25), single MSC transplantation (n = 20) improved the EF by 4.54 ± 2%, and repeated intervention (n = 20) did so by 7.45 ± 2% when measured by CMR imaging (P < 0.001); when evaluated by echocardiography, these values were 6.71 ± 2.4 and 10.71 ± 2.5%, respectively (P < 0.001).

conclusionsIntracoronary transplantation of WJ-MSCs 3-7 days after AMI in selected patients significantly improves LVEF, with the infusion of a booster dose 10 days later augmenting this effect.

trial registrationTrial registration: Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials, IRCT20201116049408N1. Retrospectively Registered 20 Nov. 2020, https://en.irct.ir/trial/52357.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationMesenchymal Stem CellsMyocardial InfarctionPercutaneous Coronary InterventionHumansIranSingle-Blind MethodStroke VolumeVentricular Function, LeftIntracoronary injectionMesenchymal stromal cellMyocardial infarctionStroke volumeVentricular function

Identifiers

PMID37740221
PMCPMC10517503
OpenAlexW4386979648

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.