ArticleFrontiers in public health2023
Shared decision-making in healthcare in mainland China: a scoping review.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Pooled it
- A systematic review of the effects of shared decision-making in the South Korean healthcare system.Frontiers in public health · 2025Pooled it
- Impact of two different patient decision aids in prosthodontic consultations: a prospective randomized controlled study.Clinical oral investigations · 2023Trial
- Development of a clinical implementation framework for evidence-based practice guidelines in settings featuring integrative Chinese-Western medicine.International journal of nursing sciences · 2026Article
- Factors influencing patient involvement in treatment decision-making for diabetic retinopathy: a mixed methods study protocol.BMJ open · 2026Article
- Implementing Patient Decision Aids for Insulin Initiation in China: What are the Barriers and Facilitators? A TDF-Based Qualitative Study.Journal of diabetes research · 2026Article
- Shared decision-making in primary care: barriers and facilitators from the physician's and patient's perspectives: a scoping review.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Decision Conflict Faced by First-Degree Relatives of Liver Cancer Patients in Liver Cancer Screening: A Cross-Sectional Study in China.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Clinical decision-making frameworks for pandemic preparedness and response: A scoping review.Health promotion perspectives · 2025Review
- Neurosurgical nurses' perspectives of patient-reported outcomes: a qualitative study.BMC nursing · 2025Article
- Insights of shared decision-making and personalized treatment in orthopedics - A qualitative systematic review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025Article
- Preference for palliative care among low-income advanced cancer patients in Mainland China: a qualitative study.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Embodied conversational agents for shared decision-making: a scoping review protocol.BMJ open · 2025Article
- Article
- Examining cancer patient preferences during three stages of decision making and family involvement: a multicenter survey study in China.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Surgical Decision-Making Experience of Patients with Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Qualitative Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Effects of communication, trust, and respect on shared decision-making: insights from healthcare providers in Chinese public hospitals.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Research progress and implications of the application of large language model in shared decision-making in China's healthcare field.Frontiers in public health · 2025Review
- Psychometric Properties Assessment and Determinants of the Health Services OutPatient Experience (HSOPE) Among Chinese Outpatients: A Cross-Sectional Study.Patient preference and adherence · 2025Article
- Assessing patient information needs for new antidiabetic medications to inform shared decision-making: A best-worst scaling experiment in China.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Shared decision-making (SDM) facilitates the participation of healthcare professionals and patients in treatment decisions. We conducted a scoping review to assess SDM's current status in mainland China, referencing the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF). Methods: Our review encompassed extensive searches across six English and four Chinese databases, and various gray literature until April 30, 2021. Results were synthesized using thematic analysis. Results: Out of the 60 included studies, we identified three key themes based on the ODSF framework: decisional needs, decision support, and decisional outcomes. However, there appears to be a lack of comprehensive understanding of concepts related to decisional needs in China. Only a few studies have delved into feasibility, preference, choice, and outcome factors in the SDM process. Another challenge emerges from an absence of uniform standards for developing patient decision aids (PDAs). Furthermore, regarding health outcome indicators, their predominant focus remains on physiological needs. Conclusion: SDM is in its infancy in mainland China. It is important to explore the concept and expression of decisional needs in the context of Chinese culture. Subsequent studies should focus on constructing a scientifically rigorous and systematic approach for the development of PDAs, and considering the adaptation of SDM steps to the clinical context in China during SDM implementation. Concurrently, The focus on health outcomes in Chinese SDM studies, driven by the unique healthcare resource landscape, underscores the necessity of prioritizing basic needs within limited resources. Systematic review registration: https://inplasy.com/?s=202130021.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.