Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37744953›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.)2023

Evaluation of synthetically generated computed tomography for use in transcranial focused ultrasound procedures.

Han Liu, Michelle K Sigona, Thomas J Manuel, Li Min Chen, Benoit M Dawant, Charles F Caskey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical imaging (Bellingham, Wash.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Han LiuVanderbilt University, Department of Computer Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4756-7149
Michelle K SigonaVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4628-7687
Thomas J ManuelVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Li Min ChenVanderbilt University, Institute of Imaging Science, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Benoit M DawantVanderbilt University, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.
Charles F CaskeyVanderbilt University, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Nashville, Tennessee, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4545-4842

Funding

Development of an MRgFUS system for precision-targeted neuromodulation of pain circuits with simultaneous functional MRIU18EB029351 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI CASKEY, CHARLES F, CHEN, LI MIN · 2019 to 2019
$3.6M
NIBIB NIH HHS U18 EB029351
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: Transcranial focused ultrasound (tFUS) is a therapeutic ultrasound method that focuses sound through the skull to a small region noninvasively and often under magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) guidance. CT imaging is used to estimate the acoustic properties that vary between individual skulls to enable effective focusing during tFUS procedures, exposing patients to potentially harmful radiation. A method to estimate acoustic parameters in the skull without the need for CT is desirable. Approach: We synthesized CT images from routinely acquired T1-weighted MRI using a 3D patch-based conditional generative adversarial network and evaluated the performance of synthesized CT (sCT) images for treatment planning with tFUS. We compared the performance of sCT with real CT (rCT) images for tFUS planning using Kranion and simulations using the acoustic toolbox, k-Wave. Simulations were performed for 3 tFUS scenarios: (1) no aberration correction, (2) correction with phases calculated from Kranion, and (3) phase shifts calculated from time reversal. Results: From Kranion, the skull density ratio, skull thickness, and number of active elements between rCT and sCT had Pearson's correlation coefficients of 0.94, 0.92, and 0.98, respectively. Among 20 targets, differences in simulated peak pressure between rCT and sCT were largest without phase correction ( Conclusions: Real and synthetically generated skulls had comparable image similarity, skull measurements, and acoustic simulation metrics. Our work demonstrated similar results for 10 testing cases comparing MR-sCTs and rCTs for tFUS planning. Source code and a docker image with the trained model are available at https://github.com/han-liu/SynCT_TcMRgFUS.

Indexed as

acoustic simulationconditional adversarial networksimage-guidedimage translationsynthetic CTtranscranial focused ultrasound

Identifiers

PMID37744953
PMCPMC10514703

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.