ArticleExperimental and therapeutic medicine2023
Effects of Niaoduqing granules on inflammatory response of diabetic kidney disease: A meta‑analysis.
Article in Experimental and therapeutic medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetic kidney disease (DKD) is one of the most severe chronic microvascular complications of diabetes and the leading cause of end-stage kidney disease worldwide. The mechanism of inflammation underlying DKD has been attracting attention over recent years, but effective therapeutic strategies have remained elusive. Niaoduqing (NDQ) granules are one of the most commonly used drugs for the treatment of DKD in China, and it has therapeutic effects against inflammation in DKD. Therefore, the aim of the present analysis was to evaluate the inflammatory response outcomes and safety of NDQ granules for the treatment of DKD. The following databases were searched from their inception to 31st of May 2023 to obtain published accounts of relevant randomized controlled trials: China National Knowledge Infrastructure, China Science and Technology Journal, Wanfang, The Chinese Biomedicine, PubMed, Web of Science and Cochrane Library. The 'risk of bias' evaluation tool produced by the Cochrane Collaboration Handbook was used for evaluating the quality, whereas Revman software (version 5.3) was used for meta-analysis. In total, 16 studies were included into the present study according to criteria, with a total of 1,526 patients. Compared with those in the control group, the results of the meta-analysis revealed that the combination of conventional treatment and NDQ granules may further decrease C-reactive protein [standardized mean difference (SMD), -1.33; 95% confidence interval (CI), -1.76, -0.91; P<0.00001], TNF-α (SMD, -1.90; 95% CI, -2.35,-1.45; P<0.00001) and IL-6 (SMD, -1.72; 95% CI, -2.52,-0.91; P<0.0001) levels, whilst increasing the clinical effective rate (risk ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.14,1.29; P<0.00001), in patients with DKD. In terms of safety, a total of 34 and 39 patients included in the intervention and in the control group, respectively, developed adverse reactions. Results from the present analysis suggest that NDQ granules may be beneficial in suppressing inflammation caused by DKD when used in combination with conventional treatment, potentially guiding future directions in clinical practice. However, further high-quality studies are needed to confirm the anti-inflammation response in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.