Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37745478›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2024

Evaluating batch correction methods for image-based cell profiling.

John Arevalo, Ellen Su, Robert van Dijk, Anne E Carpenter, Shantanu Singh

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

John ArevaloImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1138-5036
Ellen SuImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0009-0007-8934-8642
Robert van DijkImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Anne E CarpenterImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1555-8261
Shantanu SinghImaging Platform, Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3150-3025

Funding

Extracting rich information from biological imagesR35GM122547 · NIGMS · BROAD INSTITUTE, INC. · PI Anne E. Carpenter · 2017 to 2026
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM122547
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-throughput image-based profiling platforms are powerful technologies capable of collecting data from billions of cells exposed to thousands of perturbations in a time- and cost-effective manner. Therefore, image-based profiling data has been increasingly used for diverse biological applications, such as predicting drug mechanism of action or gene function. However, batch effects pose severe limitations to community-wide efforts to integrate and interpret image-based profiling data collected across different laboratories and equipment. To address this problem, we benchmarked seven high-performing scRNA-seq batch correction techniques, representing diverse approaches, using a newly released Cell Painting dataset, the largest publicly accessible image-based dataset. We focused on five different scenarios with varying complexity, and we found that Harmony, a mixture-model based method, consistently outperformed the other tested methods. Our proposed framework, benchmark, and metrics can additionally be used to assess new batch correction methods in the future. Overall, this work paves the way for improvements that allow the community to make best use of public Cell Painting data for scientific discovery.

Indexed as

Batch correctionCell PaintingHarmonyhigh-throughput phenotypic screeningimage-based profilingmachine learningmorphological profilingpseudo-bulk analysis

Identifiers

PMID37745478
PMCPMC10516049

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.