ArticleThe Lancet. Rheumatology2022
Sex differences in clinical outcomes and biological profiles in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: a post-hoc analysis of two randomised controlled trials.
Article in The Lancet. Rheumatology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex-dependent mechanisms in rheumatic diseases.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2026Review
- Radiomic analysis of high-resolution computed tomography predicts interstitial lung disease progression and mortality in systemic sclerosis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Sex Disparity in Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Pulmonary Fibrosis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Tocilizumab and rituximab for systemic sclerosis interstitial lung disease: a real-world cohort analysis.Rheumatology (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Treatment Response and Safety Profile of Nintedanib in Connective Tissue Disease-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease: A Retrospective Observational Study.Mediterranean journal of rheumatology · 2025Article
- Sex Bias in Systemic Sclerosis: from Clinical to Immunological Differences.Clinical reviews in allergy & immunology · 2025Review
- Sex- and gender-based personalized medicine in rheumatology.Nature reviews. Rheumatology · 2025Article
- [Septic musculoskeletal complications under immunomodulating treatment].Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie · 2025Review
- Characterization of Incident Interstitial Lung Disease in Late Systemic Sclerosis.Arthritis & rheumatology (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2025Article
- An exploratory analysis of differences in serum protein expression by sex in patients with systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- An exploratory analysis of differences in serum protein expression by sex in patients with systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2025Article
- Sex differences in systemic sclerosis: from pathogenesis to clinical manifestations and treatment.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Review
- Menopause in systemic sclerosis: the impact on clinical presentation in a multicenter cross-sectional analysis from the National Registry of the Italian Society for Rheumatology (SPRING-SIR).Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Article
- Prevalence and gender - specific analysis of a systemic sclerosis cohort in Latvia.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2024Article
- Mechanisms underlying sex differences in autoimmunity.The Journal of clinical investigation · 2024Review
- Development of a multivariable prediction model for progression of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease.RMD open · 2024Article
- Utility of peripheral protein biomarkers for the prediction of incident interstitial features: a multicentre retrospective cohort study.BMJ open respiratory research · 2024Article
- Sex bias in immune response: it is time to include the sex variable in studies of autoimmune rheumatic diseases.Rheumatology international · 2024Article
- Respiratory tract lining fluid copper content contributes to pulmonary oxidative stress in patients with systemic sclerosis.Wellcome open research · 2024Article
- The Impact of Progressive Pulmonary Fibrosis in Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background: Observational studies have shown that men with systemic sclerosis have an increased risk of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and mortality compared with women. However, previous studies have not controlled for treatment effect or evaluated the biological mechanism or mechanisms underlying this sex difference. We aimed to compare ILD progression and long-term morbidity and mortality outcomes in male and female participants of two randomised controlled trials for systemic sclerosis-associated ILD. Methods: For this post-hoc analysis, data from all participants in the Scleroderma Lung Study (SLS) I and SLS II were analysed. The primary objective was to explore the effect of sex on the course of the percentage predicted forced vital capacity (FVC) during and after active treatment over the 24-month study periods. In SLS I, 158 participants (111 women, 47 men) were randomly assigned to receive oral cyclophosphamide (cyclophosphamide; ≤2 mg/kg daily) or placebo; in SLS II, 142 participants (105 women, 37 men) were randomly assigned to receive oral mycophenolate mofetil (1500 mg twice daily) or oral cyclophosphamide (≤2 mg/kg daily). Sex (ie, male or female) was self-reported in both studies by the participants. Changes in radiographic fibrosis and time to death and respiratory failure were secondary outcomes of the present analysis. Baseline levels of biomarkers implicated in the pathobiology of systemic sclerosis-associated ILD were measured in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid in SLS I. Findings: In the SLS I placebo group, the rate of decline in percentage predicted FVC from 3 months to 12 months was greater in men than in women, but the difference was not significant (estimated effect -0·29 [95% CI -0·67 to 0·10]; p=0·14). In SLS II, the rate of decline in percentage predicted FVC from 3 months to 12 months was significantly worse in men treated with either cyclophosphamide (estimated effect -0·72; [95% CI -1·14 to -0·31]; p=0·00060) or mycophenolate mofetil (estimated effect -0·34 [-0·58 to -0·10]; p=0·0051) than in women. A greater proportion of men had a decline in percentage predicted FVC of 10% or greater compared with women for the pooled active treatment groups from SLS I and SLS II and the placebo group of SLS I. Men had worse radiographic outcomes at 2 years than women in SLS II, even after adjusting for baseline disease severity and treatment arm assignment. Long-term survival was worse in men in SLS I (log-rank test p=0·080) and SLS II (log-rank test p=0·030). In SLS II, male sex was independently associated with increased mortality (hazard ratio 2·42 [95% CI 1·16 to 5·04]; p=0·018). In bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, men had increased concentrations of pro-fibrotic mediators (eg, matrix metalloproteinase-13 and tissue inhibitor of metallopeptidase 1), whereas women had increased pro-inflammatory mediators (eg, interleukin [IL]-12, IL-7, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor). Interpretation: In two randomised controlled trials, men with systemic sclerosis-associated ILD had a less favourable course of ILD both with and without active treatment, as well as worse long-term survival. Sex differences in pro-fibrotic or inflammatory mediators of disease might account for these differences and warrant future study. Funding: US National Institutes of Health; US National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; US National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases; Bristol Myers Squibb; and Hoffmann-LaRoche.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.