Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37746437›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Outcomes and Follow-Up Data From Two Skin Cancer Screening Events.

Jade N Young, Nithya Krishnamurthy, Annie Chang, Dina Poplausky, Nicholas Gulati, Jonathan Ungar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jade N YoungDermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Nithya KrishnamurthyDermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Annie ChangDermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Dina PoplauskyDermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Nicholas GulatiDermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.
Jonathan UngarDermatology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the outcomes and follow-up behaviors of participants from two free skin cancer screening events in the United States. This survey, with 296 participants and a 31% response rate, gathered information on participant demographics, personal history of skin cancer, knowledge of skin screening practices, and follow-up behaviors. There was a high follow-up rate of 92.3% among individuals recommended for further dermatological consultation, but a low (22%) concordance rate between the preliminary diagnoses from the screening and patient-recalled diagnoses. Additionally, about one-sixth of participants identified limited access to care as a motivation for participating in the screening. The study emphasizes the need to improve awareness about the limitations of free screenings, enhance participant education, and ensure equitable access to skin cancer screening. Future research should focus on factors influencing follow-up behaviors and the development of targeted interventions to increase awareness and access to skin cancer screening.

Indexed as

dermatology screeningfree skin screeningskin cancerskin cancer screeningskin screening outcomes

Identifiers

PMID37746437
PMCPMC10513346

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.