ArticleDiabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy2023
Development of Patient-Reported Outcome Scale for Patients with Diabetic Foot and Its Reliability and Validity Test.
Article in Diabetes, metabolic syndrome and obesity : targets and therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Benefits of Multi-Disciplinary Limb Preservation Teams.Clinics in podiatric medicine and surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To construct a self-reported outcome scale for diabetic foot patients, and to test its reliability and validity. Methods: Through literature reading and interviews with 30 patients, a pool of scale items was formed. The items were classified and sorted out according to the expected scale structure framework. After two rounds of expert consultation and a small range of test dressing, the initial scale was formed. Through the investigation of 85 patients with diabetic foot, item differentiation analysis, correlation analysis and exploratory factor analysis were used to screen the items. Cronbach's α coefficient, retest reliability and content and structure validity analysis were used to determine the feasibility and validity of the scale. Results: The final scale included 4 first-level items and 22 second-level items. The critical ratio method showed that the scores of each item in the high group and the low group were significantly different (P < 0.05). Correlation analysis showed that the correlation coefficient between each item and the total score was 0.431 to 0.829; The content validity index of the scale was 0.91, the exploratory factor analysis identified three common factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 75.381%. The confirmatory factor analysis showed that the model fit well. The Cronbach's α coefficient of the scale was 0.934 and the retest reliability coefficient was 0.926. Conclusion: The self-reported outcome scale for diabetic foot patients has good reliability and validity, and can be used to investigate the health status of diabetic foot patients and evaluate the therapeutic effect.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.