ArticleReproductive biomedicine online2023
Associations of reproductive and breastfeeding history with anti-Müllerian hormone concentration among African-American women of reproductive age.
Article in Reproductive biomedicine online, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
research questionAre gravidity, parity and breastfeeding history associated with anti-Müllerian hormone concentration among African-American women of reproductive age?
designThis study included baseline data from the Study of the Environment, Lifestyle and Fibroids, a 5-year longitudinal study of African-American women. Within this community cohort, data from 1392 women aged 25-35 years were analysed. The primary outcome was serum anti-Müllerian hormone concentration measured using the Ansh Labs picoAMH assay, an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Multivariable linear regression models were used to estimate mean differences in anti-Müllerian hormone concentration (β) and 95% CI by self-reported gravidity, parity and breastfeeding history, with adjustment for potential confounders.
resultsOf the 1392 participants, 1063 had a history of gravidity (76.4%). Of these, 891 (83.8%) were parous and 564 had breastfed. Multivariable-adjusted regression analyses found no appreciable difference in anti-Müllerian hormone concentration between nulligravid participants and those with a history of gravidity (β = -0.025, 95% CI -0.145 to 0.094). Among participants with a history of gravidity, there was little difference in anti-Müllerian hormone concentration between parous and nulliparous participants (β = 0.085, 95% CI -0.062 to 0.232). There was also little association between anti-Müllerian hormone concentration and breastfeeding history (ever versus never: β = 0.009, 95% CI -0.093 to 0.111) or duration of breastfeeding (per 1-month increase: β = -0.002, 95% CI -0.010 to 0.006).
conclusionsGravidity, parity and breastfeeding history were not meaningfully associated with anti-Müllerian hormone concentration in this large sample of the Study of the Environment, Lifestyle and Fibroids cohort.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.