Evidence mapPaperPMID 37753342Full record

ArticleJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2023

Live Birth Outcomes for PCOS Patients Under the Follicular-Phase Long-Acting GnRH Agonist Protocol or Antagonist Protocol - A Retrospective Chinese Cohort.

Jiajia Zhai, Junyan Zhang, Jingfang He, Minzhi Lv, Bozheng Zhang, Guanqun Li, Yuanjie Du, Guimin Hao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jiajia ZhaiDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-3051-2184
Junyan ZhangShanxi Bethune Hospital, Shanxi Academy Of Medical Sciences, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Medicine, Taiyuan, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7890-3707
Jingfang HeBothwin Clinical Study Consultant, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Minzhi LvDepartment of Biostatistics, Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Bozheng ZhangDepartment of Psychology, College of Arts and Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 98053, USA.
Guanqun LiTechnoderma Medicines Inc, Shanghai, People's Republic of China.
Yuanjie DuDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.
Guimin HaoDepartment of Reproductive Medicine, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-0185-8442

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: For patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) to undergo in vitro fertilization (IVF) and embryo transfer (ET), there has been no consensus regarding which protocol is the most optimal for live birth rate in fresh cycles. We sought to evaluate depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist protocol versus GnRH antagonist protocol in IVF outcomes for PCOS patients in a single fertility center. Methods: In this retrospective cohort, PCOS patients who visited the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University reproductive center between February 2012 and December 2019 were screened, and 533 PCOS infertility patients were included undergoing their first IVF cycle, with 470 in the depot GnRH agonist group and 63 in the GnRH antagonist group. The primary of this study outcome was the fresh live birth rate (LBR). Results: PCOS women in the depot GnRH agonist group had a higher LBR (49.79%) than those in the GnRH antagonist group (34.92%, p = 0.027). The multivariable logistic regression also confirmed that women in the depot GnRH agonist group had a higher LBR than those in the GnRH antagonist group (OR = 1.83, 95% CI 1.05~3.18, p = 0.032). After propensity score matching (PSM), the LBR in the depot GnRH agonist group was higher (50.32%) than that of the GnRH antagonist group (35.48%), p = 0.033. The ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) rates were similar between the two groups, with 35 in the depot GnRH group and 6 in the GnRH antagonist group (p = 0.561). Conclusions: For PCOS patients in fresh embryo transfer cycles, the depot GnRH agonist protocol may lead to a higher LBR than the antagonist protocol with satisfied lower OHSS rates.

Indexed as

cumulative live birth ratedepot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist protocolgonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist protocollive birth ratePCOS

Identifiers

PMID37753342
PMCPMC10518358

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.