ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2023
Risk Assessment for Cardiovascular Disease Using the Framingham Risk Score and Globorisk Score Among Newly Diagnosed Metabolic Syndrome Patients.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association between systemic inflammatory response index and cardiovascular disease risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients: a machine learning based on US and Chinese cohorts.Clinical rheumatology · 2026Article
- Performance of Cardiovascular Disease (CVD) Risk Assessment Tools in Clinical Practice - Agreement Between Different CVD Risk Scores Among Patients Attending NCD Clinic in a Tertiary Care Setting: A Prospective Observational Study.International journal of preventive medicine · 2026Article
- Systemic inflammation as a mediator between food preferences and metabolic syndrome: a cross-sectional study.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Article
- Development of an explainable machine learning model for 3-year cardiovascular risk prediction in new-onset type 2 diabetes using the TyG index and ultrasound features.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2025Article
- Nontraditional Factors Influencing Cardiovascular Disease Risk: Correlation Among Framingham Risk Score, Body Composition Index, and Sleep-Breathing Monitoring Index.Clinical and translational science · 2025Article
- Independent and combined associations of VOCs exposure and MetS in theFrontiers in public health · 2025Article
- The interplay of factors in metabolic syndrome: understanding its roots and complexity.Molecular medicine (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: The presence of metabolic syndrome (MetS) is linked to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) development. In this study, CVD risk was calculated among individuals with newly diagnosed MetS using the Framingham Risk Score (FRS) and Globorisk Score. The FRS and Globorisk score are particularly relevant in predicting CVD risk as these scores include key MetS-related risk factors like blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and age. Patients and Methods: A community-based cross-sectional study was conducted at various sites in Karachi, Pakistan, from February 2022 to August 2022. Newly diagnosed cases of MetS with no physical disability, known illness, and not taking any regular medication were recruited. MetS was defined based on the definition of International Diabetes Federation. The major outcome was 10-year risk for CVD using the FRS and Globorisk Score. Results: Of 304 patients, 59.2% were classified as low risk according to FRS, while 20.4% were classified as moderate and high risk each. Using the Globorisk score, 44.6% of 224 patients were classified as low risk, 34.4% as moderate risk, and 21.0% as high risk. A moderate positive correlation was observed between the two CVD risk scores (r = 0.651, 95% CI 0.58-0.71). Both risk scores have reported age, gender, and current smokers as significant risk factors in predicting CVD in 10-years (P < 0.05). Conclusion: The outcome of both CVD risk scores predicted moderate-to-high risk of CVD in 10-years in almost half of the newly diagnosed patients with MetS. In particular, the risk of development of CVD in 10-years in newly diagnosed MetS is higher with increasing age, in male gender, and current smokers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.