Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37755233›Full record

ReviewExperimental physiology2024

Selective efferent vagal stimulation in heart failure.

Lindsea C Booth, Baagavi Saseetharan, Clive N May, Song T Yao

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Experimental physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cardiac vagal motor neurons.Current opinion in neurobiology · 2025
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Fast and slow lanes of the vagus.Experimental physiology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Lindsea C BoothFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3093-5766
Baagavi SaseetharanFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7039-1649
Clive N MayFlorey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia.
Song T YaoDepartment of Anatomy and Physiology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3337-4490
The University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

NHMRC 1128108NHMRC 2019079
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients diagnosed with heart failure have high rates of mortality and morbidity. Based on promising preclinical studies, vagal nerve stimulation has been trialled in these patients using whole nerve electrical stimulation, but the results have been mixed. This is, at least in part, due to an inability to selectively recruit the activity of specific fibres within the vagus with whole nerve electrical stimulation, as well as not knowing which the 'therapeutic' fibres are. This symposium review focuses on a population of cardiac-projecting efferent vagal fibres with cell bodies located within the dorsal motor nucleus of the vagus nerve and a new method of selectively targeting these projections as a potential treatment in heart failure.

Indexed as

Heart FailureVagus NerveVagus Nerve StimulationAnimalsEfferent PathwaysHeartHumansheart failureoptogenetic nerve stimulationvagal nerve stimulation

Identifiers

PMID37755233
PMCPMC11607613
OpenAlexW4387060226

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.