ArticlePloS one2023
Multi-objective numerical optimization of 3D-printed polylactic acid bio-metamaterial based on topology, filling pattern, and infill density via fatigue lifetime and mass.
Article in PloS one, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Infill parameters are significant with regard to the overall cost and saving material while printing a 3D model. When it comes to printing time, we can decrease the printing time by altering the infill, which also reduces the total process extent. Choosing the right filling parameters affects the strength of the printed model. In this research, the effect of filling density and infill pattern on the fatigue lifetime of cylindrical polylactic acid (PLA) samples was investigated with finite element modeling and analysis. This causes the lattice structure to be considered macro-scale porosity in the additive manufacturing process. Due to the need for multi-objective optimization of several functions at the same time and the inevitable sacrifice of other objectives, the decision was to obtain a set of compromise solutions according to the Pareto-optimal solution technique or the Pareto non-inferior solution approach. As a result, a horizontally printed rectangular pattern with 60% filling was preferred over the four patterns including honeycomb, triangular, regular octagon, and irregular octagon by considering the sum of mass changes and fatigue lifetime changes, and distance from the optimal point, which is the lightest structure with the maximum fatigue lifetime as an objective function with an emphasis on mass as an important parameter in designing scaffolds and biomedical structures. A new structure was also proposed by performing a structural optimization process using computer-aided design tools and also, computer-aided engineering software by Dassault systems. Finally, the selected samples were printed and their 3D printing quality was investigated using field emission scanning electron microscopy inspection.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.