Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37760483›Full record

ReviewCancers2023

The Effects of Complementary Therapies on Patient-Reported Outcomes: An Overview of Recent Systematic Reviews in Oncology.

Marit Mentink, Daniëlle Verbeek, Janneke Noordman, Anja Timmer-Bonte, Ines von Rosenstiel, Sandra van Dulmen

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancers, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Effects of aromatherapy on chemotherapy-related symptom management.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Marit MentinkNivel (Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research), Otterstraat 118, 3512 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-1278-9665
Daniëlle VerbeekPraktijk Integratieve Oncologie, Heesterpoort 18, 9713 KZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Janneke NoordmanNivel (Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research), Otterstraat 118, 3512 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Anja Timmer-BonteDepartment of Medical Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 10, 6525 GA Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Ines von RosenstielDepartment of Integrative Oncology, Rijnstate Hospital, Wagnerlaan 55, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands.
Sandra van DulmenNivel (Netherlands Institute of Health Services Research), Otterstraat 118, 3512 CR Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLNetherlands Institute for Health Services Research · NLRijnstate Hospital · NL

Funding

Dutch Cancer Society 12566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many patients with cancer make use of complementary medicine alongside conventional medicine, but clinicians in oncology often lack the knowledge to adequately advise patients on the evidence base for complementary therapies. This study aims to provide an overview of recently published systematic reviews that assess the effects of complementary therapies on patient-reported health outcomes in patients with cancer. Systematic reviews, including a meta-analysis of at least two randomized controlled trials, were identified from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CINAHL and PsycINFO databases. The methodological quality was assessed with AMSTAR 2. One hundred systematic reviews were included. The results suggest that several complementary therapies can improve health outcomes reported by patients with cancer, such as acupuncture to relieve pain, music interventions to reduce anxiety and yoga to improve cancer-related fatigue. The side effects related to complementary therapy use are generally mild. The results remain inconclusive for some intervention-outcome combinations. Many of the included systematic reviews insufficiently assessed the causes and impact of bias in their interpretation of the results. This overview of systematic reviews can support clinicians in counselling their patients on this topic and provide directions for future research and clinical practice guidelines in the field of complementary medicine.

Indexed as

complementary medicinemeta-analysisoncologyoverview of systematic reviewspatient-reported outcomes (PROMS)

Identifiers

PMID37760483
PMCPMC10526744
OpenAlexW4386686744

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.