Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37761763›Full record

ArticleHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Bulgarian General Practitioners' Communication Styles about Child Vaccinations, Mainly Focused on Parental Decision Making in the Context of a Mandatory Immunization Schedule.

Veronika Dimitrova, Savina Stoitsova, Gergana Nenova, Maria Martinova, Milena Yakimova, Vanya Rangelova, Irina Georgieva, Ivo Georgiev, Stefka Krumova, Antoaneta Minkova and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Veronika DimitrovaDepartment of Sociology, Sofia University, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-8116-0863
Savina StoitsovaDepartment of Epidemiology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Gergana NenovaDepartment of Sociology, Sofia University, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Maria MartinovaCommunities and Identities Department, Institute of Sociology and Philosophy at the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Milena YakimovaDepartment of Sociology, Sofia University, 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Vanya RangelovaDepartment of Epidemiology and Disaster Medicine, Medical University of Plovdiv, 4002 Plovdiv, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0001-9270-5996
Irina GeorgievaDepartment of Virology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-4814-4922
Ivo GeorgievDepartment of Epidemiology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria.ORCID 0000-0002-3772-2328
Stefka KrumovaDepartment of Virology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Antoaneta MinkovaDepartment of Epidemiology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Nadezhda VladimirovaDepartment of Epidemiology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria.
Lubomira Nikolaeva-GlombDepartment of Virology, National Centre of Infectious and Parasitic Diseases, 1504 Sofia, Bulgaria.

Funding

Bulgarian National Scientific Fund № KP-06-OPR03/15, 19.12.2018
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The communication practices of general practitioners in relation with vaccines have not been a topic of wide scientific interest. In this article, we outline them in the context of Bulgaria. A representative, cross-sectional, quantitative, face-to-face survey was conducted among 358 Bulgarian general practitioners in 2022 using simple random sampling. We conducted an exploratory factor analysis using questions about the role of the GPs, which measure models of communication. Based on the factor analysis, we distinguished four communication styles. They were called: active communicator, restrictive communicator, informing communicator, and strained communicator. One-way ANOVA and the T-test were carried out to explore the connections between factor scores (communication styles) and other variables. One of the most important results in the study was that the informing physician (emphasizing the choice of the parents) was the most common model in Bulgaria. This is somewhat contradictory, because of the mandatory status of most vaccines. We found connections between the communication styles and other variables-such as the type of settlement, having a hesitant parent in the practice, recommendations of non-mandatory vaccines, and experience with vaccine-preventable diseases. On the basis of the factor analysis and analysis of relationships with other variables, we reached the conclusion that in Bulgaria, hesitant parents are not sufficiently involved in active, effective communication about vaccines by GPs.

Indexed as

communication stylesgeneral practitionersvaccine hesitancy

Identifiers

PMID37761763
PMCPMC10531209

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.