ArticleJournal of clinical medicine2023
Machine Learning Predicts 30-Day Outcome among Acute Myeloid Leukemia Patients: A Single-Center, Retrospective, Cohort Study.
Article in Journal of clinical medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanistic learning to predict and understand minimal residual disease.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Biomarkers and advances in AML-MRC: from bench to bedside.Annals of hematology · 2026Review
- A Mutational Landscape in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Overview and Prognostic Impacts.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clinical emergency requiring treatment and results in high 30-day (D30) mortality. In this study, the prediction of D30 survival was studied using a machine learning (ML) method. The total cohort consisted of 1700 survivors and 130 non-survivors at D30. Eight clinical and 42 laboratory variables were collected at the time of diagnosis by pathology. Among them, six variables were selected by a feature selection method: induction chemotherapy (CTx), hemorrhage, infection, C-reactive protein, blood urea nitrogen, and lactate dehydrogenase. Clinical and laboratory data were entered into the training model for D30 survival prediction, followed by testing. Among the tested ML algorithms, the decision tree (DT) algorithm showed higher accuracy, the highest sensitivity, and specificity values (95% CI) of 90.6% (0.918-0.951), 70.4% (0.885-0.924), and 92.1% (0.885-0.924), respectively. DT classified patients into eight specific groups with distinct features. Group 1 with CTx showed a favorable outcome with a survival rate of 97.8% (1469/1502). Group 6, with hemorrhage and the lowest fibrinogen level at diagnosis, showed the worst survival rate of 45.5% (25/55) and 20.5 days. Prediction of D30 survival among AML patients by classification of patients with DT showed distinct features that might support clinical decision-making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.