ReviewJournal of personalized medicine2023
Revisiting Oral Antiseptics, Microorganism Targets and Effectiveness.
Review in Journal of personalized medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.
- Systemic Antibiotics in the Surgical Treatment of Peri-Implantitis: Impact on the Salivary Microbiome.Journal of clinical periodontology · 2026Trial
- Antibacterial and clinical effectiveness of a mouthwash with a novel active system of amine + zinc lactate + fluoride: a randomized controlled trial.Clinical oral investigations · 2024Trial
- On-demand caries prevention: on-site generated slightly acidic electrolyzed water as a potent and biocompatible anti- Streptococcus mutans agent.BMC oral health · 2026Article
- Awareness and Usage of Water Irrigation Devices Among Implant Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of dental hygiene · 2026Article
- Protein Expression Profiles of Antiseptic-AdaptedMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Causal association between oral microbiome and chronic kidney disease: two-sample Mendelian randomization.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2026Article
- Comparative Antimicrobial and Antibiofilm Activity of Antiseptics and Commercial Mouthwashes AgainstJournal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Effects of Antiseptic Formulations on Oral Microbiota and Related Systemic Diseases: A Scoping Review.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Antiseptics Prescription for the Prevention and Treatment of Periodontal Diseases: A Comprehensive Review.Health science reports · 2025Article
- Activity of Antiseptics AgainstAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Silver Nanoparticles Synthesized FromScientifica · 2025Article
- Inhibition of the Biofilm Formation of PlantPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Antibacterial Effects of Black Cumin Seed Oil on Oral Microcosm Biofilms.Microorganisms · 2024Article
- Enhanced Anti-Bacterial Activity of Arachidonic Acid against the Cariogenic BacteriumAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Alcohol and Periodontal Disease: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A good oral health status is mostly dependent on good oral hygiene habits, which knowingly impacts systemic health. Although controversial, chemical oral antiseptics can be useful in adjunct use to mechanical dental plaque control techniques in the prevention and management of local and overall health and well-being. This review aims to revisit, gather and update evidence-based clinical indications for the use of the most popular oral antiseptics, considering different types, microorganism targets and effectiveness in order to establish updated clinical recommendations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.