Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37765271›Full record

ArticlePharmaceutics2023

Three-Dimensionally Printed Vaginal Rings: Perceptions of Women and Gynecologists in a Cross-Sectional Survey.

Laura Andrade Junqueira, Francisco José Raposo, Geraldo Sérgio Farinazzo Vitral, Atabak Ghanizadeh Tabriz, Dennis Douroumis, Nádia Rezende Barbosa Raposo, Marcos Antônio Fernandes Brandão

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Pharmaceutics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Laura Andrade JunqueiraCenter for Research and Innovation in Health Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, MG, Brazil.ORCID 0000-0002-6461-2327
Francisco José RaposoCenter for Research and Innovation in Health Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, MG, Brazil.
Geraldo Sérgio Farinazzo VitralWoman Health Investigation Group, Department of Surgery, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, MG, Brazil.
Atabak Ghanizadeh TabrizCentre for Innovation and Process Engineering Research, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Chatham ME4 4TB, UK.
Dennis DouroumisCentre for Innovation and Process Engineering Research, University of Greenwich, Chatham Maritime, Chatham ME4 4TB, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3782-0091
Nádia Rezende Barbosa RaposoCenter for Research and Innovation in Health Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, MG, Brazil.
Marcos Antônio Fernandes BrandãoCenter for Research and Innovation in Health Sciences, Department of Pharmaceutical Science, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Juiz de Fora 36036-900, MG, Brazil.

Funding

Coordenação de Aperfeicoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-dimensional printing technologies can be implemented for the fabrication of personalized vaginal rings (VRs) as an alternative approach to traditional manufacturing. Although several studies have demonstrated the potential of additive manufacturing, there is a lack of knowledge concerning the opinions of patients and clinicians. This study aimed to investigate the perception of women and gynecologists regarding VRs with personalized shapes. The devices were printed with different designs (traditional, "Y", "M", and flat circle) by Fused Deposition Modeling for a cross-sectional survey with 155 participants. Their anticipated opinion was assessed through a questionnaire after a visual/tactile analysis of the VRs. The findings revealed that most women would feel comfortable using some of the 3D-printed VR designs and demonstrated good acceptability for the traditional and two innovative designs. However, women presented multiple preferences when the actual geometry was assessed, which directly related to their age, previous use of the vaginal route, and perception of comfort. In turn, gynecologists favored prescribing traditional and flat circle designs. Overall, although there was a difference in the perception between women and gynecologists, they had a positive opinion of the 3D-printed VRs. Finally, the personalized VRs could lead to an increase in therapeutic adherence, by meeting women's preferences.

Indexed as

3D printingdrug deliveryfused deposition modelingpersonalized medical devicesvaginal ringwomen’s health

Identifiers

PMID37765271
PMCPMC10537249

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.