Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37765411›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2023

Physiological Comparison of Two Salt-Excluder Hybrid Grapevine Rootstocks under Salinity Reveals Different Adaptation Qualities.

Pranavkumar Gajjar, Ahmed Ismail, Tabibul Islam, Ahmed G Darwish, Md Moniruzzaman, Eman Abuslima, Ahmed S Dawood, Abdelkareem M El-Saady, Violeta Tsolova, Ashraf El-Kereamy and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Pranavkumar GajjarCenter for Viticulture and Small Fruit Research, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32308, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1535-371X
Ahmed IsmailCenter for Viticulture and Small Fruit Research, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32308, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-1936-9572
Tabibul IslamAlson H. Smith Jr. Agricultural Research and Extension Center, School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Winchester, VA 22602, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-7466-397X
Ahmed G DarwishCenter for Viticulture and Small Fruit Research, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32308, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5994-563X
Md MoniruzzamanCenter for Viticulture and Small Fruit Research, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32308, USA.
Eman AbuslimaDepartment of Botany and Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Suez Canal University, Ismailia 41522, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0001-7432-8920
Ahmed S DawoodHorticulture Department, Faculty of Agriculture, Al-Azhar University, Cairo 11884, Egypt.
Abdelkareem M El-SaadyFertilization Technology Department, National Research Center (NRC), Cairo 12622, Egypt.
Violeta TsolovaCenter for Viticulture and Small Fruit Research, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32308, USA.
Ashraf El-KereamyDepartment of Botany and Plant Sciences, University of California Riverside, Riverside, CA 92521, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-2301-7750
Peter NickMolecular Cell Biology, Botanical Institute, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), 76131 Karlsruhe, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0763-4175
Sherif M SherifAlson H. Smith Jr. Agricultural Research and Extension Center, School of Plant and Environmental Sciences, Virginia Tech, Winchester, VA 22602, USA.
Michael D AbazingeSchool of the Environment, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32307, USA.
Islam El-SharkawyCenter for Viticulture and Small Fruit Research, College of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Florida A&M University, Tallahassee, FL 32308, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0303-5538
Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University · USUniversity of California, Riverside · USVirginia Tech · USAl-Azhar University · EGKarlsruhe Institute of Technology · DESuez Canal University · EG

Funding

National Academy of Sciences (NAS) Project #2000009143
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Like other plant stresses, salinity is a central agricultural problem, mainly in arid or semi-arid regions. Therefore, salt-adapted plants have evolved several adaptation strategies to counteract salt-related events, such as photosynthesis inhibition, metabolic toxicity, and reactive oxygen species (ROS) formation. European grapes are usually grafted onto salt-tolerant rootstocks as a cultivation practice to alleviate salinity-dependent damage. In the current study, two grape rootstocks, 140 Ruggeri (RUG) and Millardet et de Grasset 420A (MGT), were utilized to evaluate the diversity of their salinity adaptation strategies. The results showed that RUG is able to maintain higher levels of the photosynthetic pigments (Chl-T, Chl-a, and Chl-b) under salt stress, and hence accumulates higher levels of total soluble sugars (TSS), monosaccharides, and disaccharides compared with the MGT rootstock. Moreover, it was revealed that the RUG rootstock maintains and/or increases the enzymatic activities of catalase, GPX, and SOD under salinity, giving it a more efficient ROS detoxification machinery under stress.

Indexed as

grapevines rootstocksphotosynthesisROS detoxification machinerysalinitysugar accumulation

Identifiers

PMID37765411
PMCPMC10535200
OpenAlexW4386712310

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.