Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37766466›Full record

SynthesisEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2023

Time-trend treatment effect of cardiac resynchronization therapy with or without defibrillator on mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Boglárka Veres, Péter Fehérvári, Marie Anne Engh, Péter Hegyi, Sara Gharehdaghi, Endre Zima, Gábor Duray, Béla Merkely, Annamária Kosztin

Open access · hybridAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Association of vectorcardiographic T-wave area with clinical and echocardiographic outcomes in cardiac resynchronization therapy.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. CRT-D or CRT-P?: the endless debate!Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 3 countries.

Boglárka VeresHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor Str. 68, 1122 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-3889-3794
Péter FehérváriCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4377-018X
Marie Anne EnghCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-4269-5130
Péter HegyiCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Sara GharehdaghiCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0002-9123-5555
Endre ZimaHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor Str. 68, 1122 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-5132-6009
Gábor DurayCenter for Translational Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-1286-6576
Béla MerkelyHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor Str. 68, 1122 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6514-0723
Annamária KosztinHeart and Vascular Center, Semmelweis University, Városmajor Str. 68, 1122 Budapest, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6647-2623
Semmelweis University · HU

Funding

Artificial Intelligence National Laboratory RRF-2.3.1-21-2022-00004European Union TKP2021-NVA-12János Bolyai Research Scholarship of the Hungarian Academy of SciencesMinistry of Innovation and Technology of Hungary from the National Research, Development, and Innovation Fund TKP2021-NVANational Research, Development, and Innovation Fund of Hungary UNKP-22-3-INational Research, Development and Innovation OfficeSemmelweis 250+ Excellence Ph.D. Scholarship EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00009
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed to investigate the impact of cardiac resynchronization therapy with a defibrillator (CRT-D) on mortality, comparing it with CRT with a pacemaker (CRT-P). Additionally, the study sought to identify subgroups, evaluate the time trend in treatment effects, and analyze patient characteristics, considering the changing indications over the past decades. METHODS AND

resultsPubMed, CENTRAL, and Embase up to October 2021 were screened for studies comparing CRT-P and CRT-D, focusing on mortality. Altogether 26 observational studies were selected comprising 128 030 CRT patients, including 55 469 with CRT-P and 72 561 with CRT-D device. Cardiac resynchronization therapy with defibrillator was able to reduce all-cause mortality by almost 20% over CRT-P [adjusted hazard ratio (HR): 0.85; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.76-0.94; P < 0.01] even in propensity-matched studies (HR: 0.83; 95% CI: 0.80-0.87; P < 0.001) but not in those with non-ischaemic aetiology (HR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.79-1.15; P = 0.19) or over 75 years (HR: 1.08; 95% CI 0.96-1.21; P = 0.17). When treatment effect on mortality was investigated by the median year of inclusion, there was a difference between studies released before 2015 and those thereafter. Time-trend effects could be also observed in patients' characteristics: CRT-P candidates were getting older and the prevalence of ischaemic aetiology was increasing over time.

conclusionThe results of this systematic review of observational studies, mostly retrospective with meta-analysis, suggest that patients with CRT-D had a lower risk of mortality compared with CRT-P. However, subgroups could be identified, where CRT-D was not superior such as non-ischaemic and older patients. An improved treatment effect of CRT-D on mortality could be observed between the early and late studies partly related to the changed characteristics of CRT candidates.

Indexed as

Cardiac Resynchronization TherapyDefibrillators, ImplantableHeart FailureCardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesElectric CountershockHumansRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsTime FactorsTreatment OutcomeCardiac resynchronization therapyCRT-P vs. CRT-DHeart failureMeta-analysisSudden cardiac death

Identifiers

PMID37766466
PMCPMC10585357
OpenAlexW4387114926

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.