Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37767905›Full record

ArticleAlzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association2024

CT-based volumetric measures obtained through deep learning: Association with biomarkers of neurodegeneration.

Meera Srikrishna, Nicholas J Ashton, Alexis Moscoso, Joana B Pereira, Rolf A Heckemann, Danielle van Westen, Giovanni Volpe, Joel Simrén, Anna Zettergren, Silke Kern and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. CT-based volumetric measures obtained through deep learning: Association with biomarkers of neurodegeneration.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Meera SrikrishnaWallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Nicholas J AshtonWallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Alexis MoscosoWallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Joana B PereiraDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Rolf A HeckemannDepartment of Medical Radiation Sciences, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Danielle van WestenDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Diagnostic Radiology, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Giovanni VolpeDepartment of Physics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Joel SimrénDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Physiology and Neuroscience, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Anna ZettergrenNeuropsychiatric Epidemiology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Centre for Ageing and Health (AgeCap), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Silke KernNeuropsychiatric Epidemiology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Centre for Ageing and Health (AgeCap), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Lars-Olof WahlundDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Bibek GyanwaliMemory Aging and Cognition Centre, National University Health System, Singapore.
Saima HilalMemory Aging and Cognition Centre, National University Health System, Singapore.
Joyce Chong RuifenMemory Aging and Cognition Centre, National University Health System, Singapore.
Henrik ZetterbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Physiology and Neuroscience, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kaj BlennowDepartment of Psychiatry and Neurochemistry, Institute of Physiology and Neuroscience, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Eric WestmanDivision of Clinical Geriatrics, Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Christopher ChenMemory Aging and Cognition Centre, National University Health System, Singapore.
Ingmar SkoogNeuropsychiatric Epidemiology, Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Sahlgrenska Academy, Centre for Ageing and Health (AgeCap), University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Michael SchöllWallenberg Centre for Molecular and Translational Medicine, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-7800-1781

Funding

Alzheimer's Association #ADSF-21-831376-CAlzheimer's Association #ADSF-21-831377-CAlzheimer's Association #ADSF-21-831381-C
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCranial computed tomography (CT) is an affordable and widely available imaging modality that is used to assess structural abnormalities, but not to quantify neurodegeneration. Previously we developed a deep-learning-based model that produced accurate and robust cranial CT tissue classification. MATERIALS AND

methodsWe analyzed 917 CT and 744 magnetic resonance (MR) scans from the Gothenburg H70 Birth Cohort, and 204 CT and 241 MR scans from participants of the Memory Clinic Cohort, Singapore. We tested associations between six CT-based volumetric measures (CTVMs) and existing clinical diagnoses, fluid and imaging biomarkers, and measures of cognition.

resultsCTVMs differentiated cognitively healthy individuals from dementia and prodromal dementia patients with high accuracy levels comparable to MR-based measures. CTVMs were significantly associated with measures of cognition and biochemical markers of neurodegeneration. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest the potential future use of CT-based volumetric measures as an informative first-line examination tool for neurodegenerative disease diagnostics after further validation. HIGHLIGHTS: Computed tomography (CT)-based volumetric measures can distinguish between patients with neurodegenerative disease and healthy controls, as well as between patients with prodromal dementia and controls. CT-based volumetric measures associate well with relevant cognitive, biochemical, and neuroimaging markers of neurodegenerative diseases. Model performance, in terms of brain tissue classification, was consistent across two cohorts of diverse nature. Intermodality agreement between our automated CT-based and established magnetic resonance (MR)-based image segmentations was stronger than the agreement between visual CT and MR imaging assessment.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseDeep LearningNeurodegenerative DiseasesBiomarkersHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedBiomarkersbrain segmentationcognitionCSF biomarkersCTdeep learningdementiaplasma biomarkers

Identifiers

PMID37767905
PMCPMC10916947

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.