Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37769422›Full record

ReviewJournal of critical care2024

The human gut microbiome in critical illness: disruptions, consequences, and therapeutic frontiers.

Jaeyun Sung, Sanu S Rajendraprasad, Kemuel L Philbrick, Brent A Bauer, Ognjen Gajic, Aditya Shah, Krzysztof Laudanski, Johan S Bakken, Joseph Skalski, Lioudmila V Karnatovskaia

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of critical care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Host-Microbiome Interaction in the Intensive Care Unit.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Jaeyun SungDepartment of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Sanu S RajendraprasadDepartment of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Kemuel L PhilbrickDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Brent A BauerDepartment of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Ognjen GajicDepartment of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Aditya ShahDivision of Public Health, Infectious Diseases and Occupational Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Krzysztof LaudanskiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Johan S BakkenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, St Luke's Hospital, Duluth, MN, United States of America.
Joseph SkalskiDepartment of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Lioudmila V KarnatovskaiaDepartment of Pulmonary & Critical Care, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. Electronic address: Karnatovskaia.Lioudmila@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic in Florida · USMayo Clinic · USWinnMed · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USSt. Luke's Hospital · US

Funding

Psychological support based on positive suggestions in acute respiratory failure patientsK23HL146741 · NHLBI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KARNATOVSKAIA, LIOUDMILA · 2020 to 2024
$929k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL146741
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

With approximately 39 trillion cells and over 20 million genes, the human gut microbiome plays an integral role in both health and disease. Modern living has brought a widespread use of processed food and beverages, antimicrobial and immunomodulatory drugs, and invasive procedures, all of which profoundly disrupt the delicate homeostasis between the host and its microbiome. Of particular interest is the human gut microbiome, which is progressively being recognized as an important contributing factor in many aspects of critical illness, from predisposition to recovery. Herein, we describe the current understanding of the adverse impacts of standard intensive care interventions on the human gut microbiome and delve into how these microbial alterations can influence patient outcomes. Additionally, we explore the potential association between the gut microbiome and post-intensive care syndrome, shedding light on a previously underappreciated avenue that may enhance patient recuperation following critical illness. There is an impending need for future epidemiological studies to encompass detailed phenotypic analyses of gut microbiome perturbations. Interventions aimed at restoring the gut microbiome represent a promising therapeutic frontier in the quest to prevent and treat critical illnesses.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaCritical CareCritical IllnessDysbiosisHumansCritical illnessDysbiosisFermented foodsGutMicrobiome

Identifiers

PMID37769422
PMCPMC11034825
OpenAlexW4387072802

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.