Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37770709›Full record

ArticleNature methods2023

Learning single-cell perturbation responses using neural optimal transport.

Charlotte Bunne, Stefan G Stark, Gabriele Gut, Jacobo Sarabia Del Castillo, Mitch Levesque, Kjong-Van Lehmann, Lucas Pelkmans, Andreas Krause, Gunnar Rätsch

Erratum issuedOpen access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature methods, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 106 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
22.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 144 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Unifying multimodal single-cell data with a mixture-of-expertsbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Charlotte Bunne *Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-1431-103X
Stefan G Stark *Department of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Gabriele Gut *Department of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-8991-0040
Jacobo Sarabia Del CastilloDepartment of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Mitch LevesqueDepartment of Dermatology, University of Zurich Hospital, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland.
Kjong-Van LehmannDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland. kjlehmann@ukaachen.de.ORCID 0000-0002-1936-298X
Lucas PelkmansDepartment of Molecular Life Sciences, University of Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland. lucas.pelkmans@mls.uzh.ch.ORCID 0000-0002-6754-9730
Andreas KrauseDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland. krausea@ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-7260-9673
Gunnar RätschDepartment of Computer Science, ETH Zurich, Zürich, Switzerland. gunnar.raetsch@inf.ethz.ch.ORCID 0000-0001-5486-8532
University of Zurich · CHETH Zurich · CHSIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics · CH

Funding

EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) ERC-2019-AdG-885579Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (Swiss National Science Foundation) 310030_192622
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding and predicting molecular responses in single cells upon chemical, genetic or mechanical perturbations is a core question in biology. Obtaining single-cell measurements typically requires the cells to be destroyed. This makes learning heterogeneous perturbation responses challenging as we only observe unpaired distributions of perturbed or non-perturbed cells. Here we leverage the theory of optimal transport and the recent advent of input convex neural architectures to present CellOT, a framework for learning the response of individual cells to a given perturbation by mapping these unpaired distributions. CellOT outperforms current methods at predicting single-cell drug responses, as profiled by scRNA-seq and a multiplexed protein-imaging technology. Further, we illustrate that CellOT generalizes well on unseen settings by (1) predicting the scRNA-seq responses of holdout patients with lupus exposed to interferon-β and patients with glioblastoma to panobinostat; (2) inferring lipopolysaccharide responses across different species; and (3) modeling the hematopoietic developmental trajectories of different subpopulations.

Indexed as

Gene Expression ProfilingSingle-Cell AnalysisHumansSequence Analysis, RNA

Identifiers

PMID37770709
PMCPMC10630137
OpenAlexW4387130479

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.