ArticleBMC research notes2023
I got frightened and felt strange. I even cried a lot after the diagnosis; the experiences on the screening and management of gestational diabetes mellitus among diagnosed women.
Article in BMC research notes, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Bridging the intention-behavior gap in physical activity among pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus: a qualitative study of self-control strategy use and dynamics.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2026Article
- Integrating psychological support into gestational diabetes self-management: Development of a user-centred digital mindfulness programme.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionUnderstanding the experiences of women diagnosed with Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) can improve screening, management, and postpartum care. Therefore, this study sought to investigate experiences on the screening and management of GDM among diagnosed women.
methodsThis was a facility-based explorative qualitative design among five purposively sampled women diagnosed with GDM who were receiving care from healthcare professionals. Women were asked about their reaction to being diagnosed with GDM, their experiences with care, training, self-monitoring, and challenges with the management of GDM, and data obtained were analysed using thematic analysis.
resultsBased on the thematic analysis, three main themes and ten sub-themes were generated. They were emotional experience (prior information on GDM before being diagnosed, and feelings about the diagnosis and blood glucose measurement), information source and care experience (source of information on healthy diet, training on blood glucose measurement, experiences with follow-up, and general impressions on GDM care), and dietary and lifestyle experience ( perceptions on dietary approaches, difficulties in getting and adhering to dietary and lifestyle guidelines, alternative treatment methods patronized, and effectiveness of dietary and lifestyle approaches).
conclusionThe themes generated had psycho-emotional underpinning, and underscores the importance of psychotherapy when disclosing disease status and initiating medical care. The findings of this study could be important for the optimisation of GDM care and services for affected women.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.