ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023
Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Adapt-on-demand: Enabling flexible and scalable adaptive radiotherapy through workflow automation.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2026Article
- Direct-to-unit, single-visit, curative-intent online adaptive stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Article
- Development of an automated CBCT-based simulation-free platform for expedited palliative radiotherapy on a conventional linear accelerator.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- The feasibility of CT simulation-free adaptive radiation therapy.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Feasibility of simulation free abdominal stereotactic adaptive radiotherapy using an expedited pre-plan workflow.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2024Article
- Technical feasibility of novel immunostimulatory low-dose radiation for polymetastatic disease with CBCT-based online adaptive and conventional approaches.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- Radiobiological Modeling with Monte Carlo Tools - Simulating Cellular Responses to Ionizing Radiation.Technology in cancer research & treatmentReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Purpose: Hippocampal-avoidance whole brain radiotherapy (HA-WBRT) can be a time-consuming process compared to conventional whole brain techniques, thus potentially limiting widespread utilization. Therefore, we evaluated the Materials and methods: Ten patients previously treated for central nervous system cancers with cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging were included in this study. The CBCT was the adaptive image-of-the-day to simulate first fraction on-board imaging. Initial contours defined on the MRI were rigidly matched to the CBCT. Online ART was used to create treatment plans at first fraction. Dose-volume metrics of these simulation-free plans were compared to standard-workflow HA-WBRT plans on each patient CT simulation dataset. Timing data for the adaptive planning sessions were recorded. Results: For all ten patients, simulation-free HA-WBRT plans were successfully created utilizing the online ART workflow and met all constraints. The median hippocampi D Conclusions: Simulation-free HA-WBRT, with commercially available systems, was clinically feasible via plan-quality metrics and timing,
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.