Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37773188›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2023

Dominance is common in mammals and is associated with trans-acting gene expression and alternative splicing.

Leilei Cui, Bin Yang, Shijun Xiao, Jun Gao, Amelie Baud, Delyth Graham, Martin McBride, Anna Dominiczak, Sebastian Schafer, Regina Lopez Aumatell and 6 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 11 institutions in 6 countries.

Leilei Cui *National Key Laboratory for Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, People's Republic of China.
Bin Yang *National Key Laboratory for Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, People's Republic of China.
Shijun XiaoNational Key Laboratory for Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, People's Republic of China.
Jun GaoNational Key Laboratory for Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, People's Republic of China.
Amelie BaudCentre for Genomic Regulation (CRG), The Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology, Barcelona, Spain.
Delyth GrahamBHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK.
Martin McBrideBHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK.
Anna DominiczakBHF Glasgow Cardiovascular Research Centre, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK.
Sebastian SchaferCardiovascular and Metabolic Disorders Program, Duke-National University of Singapore Medical School, Singapore, Singapore.
Regina Lopez AumatellDepartment of Medicine and Life Sciences, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, Barcelona, Spain.
Carme MontWellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Albert Fernandez TeruelDepartamento de Psiquiatría y Medicina Legal, Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Norbert HübnerGenetics and Genomics of Cardiovascular Diseases Research Group, Max Delbrück Center (MDC) for Molecular Medicine in the Helmholtz Association, Berlin, Germany.
Jonathan FlintDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Brain Research Institute, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Richard MottUCL Genetics Institute, University College London, London, WC1E 6BT, UK. r.mott@ucl.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1022-9330
Lusheng HuangNational Key Laboratory for Pig Genetic Improvement and Production Technology, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, 330045, People's Republic of China. Lushenghuang@hotmail.com.
Jiangxi Agricultural University · CNUniversity of Glasgow · GBCentre for Genomic Regulation · ESCentre for Human Genetics · GBMax Delbrück Center · DENanchang University · CNNational University of Singapore · SGUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversitat Pompeu Fabra · ESUniversity College London · GBUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R01356X/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S017372/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDominance and other non-additive genetic effects arise from the interaction between alleles, and historically these phenomena play a major role in quantitative genetics. However, most genome-wide association studies (GWAS) assume alleles act additively.

resultsWe systematically investigate both dominance-here representing any non-additive within-locus interaction-and additivity across 574 physiological and gene expression traits in three mammalian stocks: F2 intercross pigs, rat heterogeneous stock, and mice heterogeneous stock. Dominance accounts for about one quarter of heritable variance across all physiological traits in all species. Hematological and immunological traits exhibit the highest dominance variance, possibly reflecting balancing selection in response to pathogens. Although most quantitative trait loci (QTLs) are detectable as additive QTLs, we identify 154, 64, and 62 novel dominance QTLs in pigs, rats, and mice respectively that are undetectable as additive QTLs. Similarly, even though most cis-acting expression QTLs are additive, gene expression exhibits a large fraction of dominance variance, and trans-acting eQTLs are enriched for dominance. Genes causal for dominance physiological QTLs are less likely to be physically linked to their QTLs but instead act via trans-acting dominance eQTLs. In addition, thousands of eQTLs are associated with alternatively spliced isoforms with complex additive and dominant architectures in heterogeneous stock rats, suggesting a possible mechanism for dominance.

conclusionsAlthough heritability is predominantly additive, many mammalian genetic effects are dominant and likely arise through distinct mechanisms. It is therefore advantageous to consider both additive and dominance effects in GWAS to improve power and uncover causality.

Indexed as

Alternative SplicingGenome-Wide Association StudyAnimalsGene ExpressionMammalsMiceQuantitative Trait LociRatsSwine

Identifiers

PMID37773188
PMCPMC10540365
OpenAlexW4387184996

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.