SynthesisImmunity, inflammation and disease2023
Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Immunity, inflammation and disease, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Therapeutic potential of mesenchymal stromal cells in COVID-19: a meta-analysis of clinical trials conducted since the pandemic onset.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Safety and efficacy of mesenchymal stem cells in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Immunity, inflammation and disease · 2023Pooled it
- Mechanistic Interplay Between Multiple Myeloma and Severe SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Therapeutic Promise of Mesenchymal Stem Cell-Derived Extracellular Vesicles.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- Unlocking the Cardioprotective Action of Human Amniotic Mesenchymal Stem Cells: A Review of the Current Documents.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Adoptive T-cell therapies for persistent COVID-19 in immunocompromised patients: Comparison of IFN-γ virus-specific T-cell therapy and CD45RAGeroScience · 2026Article
- Cell therapies for viral diseases: a new frontier.Seminars in immunopathology · 2025Review
- Understanding Post-COVID-19: Mechanisms, Neurological Complications, Current Treatments, and Emerging Therapies.International journal of general medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCoronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) is a zoonotic disease that has become a global pandemic. The fast evolution of the COVID-19 pandemic and persist problems make COVID-19 highly infectious; publicly accessible literature and other sources of information continue to expand in volume. The mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) therapy efficacy for COVID-19 is debatable.
objectiveThis systematic review and meta-analysis (SRMA) aimed to evaluate the usefulness of MSCs in treating COVID-19.
methodsRelevant publications were retrieved from databases up to April 30, 2022. In the case of dichotomous data, the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and pooled risk ratio (RR) were estimated with a random effects model (REM) or fixed effects model (FEM). The pooled mean difference (MD) and 95% CIs were calculated with REM or FEM in continuous data. In the outcomes, studies with insufficient or unusable data were reported descriptively.
resultsA total of eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 464 people were chosen for this SRMA. Relative to the control group, mortality was significantly lower in the MSCs group (RR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.44, 0.99, Z = 2.01, p = .04); other secondary outcomes, such as the clinical symptom improvement rate improved in the MSCs group (RR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.05, 1.99, Z = 2.24, p = .03), clinical symptom improvement time (MD: -4.01, 95% CI: -6.33, -1.68, Z = 3.38, p = .0007), C-reactive protein (CRP) (MD: -39.16, 95% CI: -44.39, -33.94, Z = 14.70, p < .00001) and days to hospital discharge (MD: -3.83, 95% CI: -6.19, -1.48, Z = 3.19, p = .001) reduced significantly in MSCs group. However, the adverse reaction incidence did not change significantly.
conclusionsMSCs are a viable therapy option for COVID-19 because of their safety and potential efficacy. With no significant adverse effects, MSCs can reduce mortality, clinical symptom improvement time, and days to hospital discharge, improve clinical symptoms, and reduce inflammatory cytokines CRP in COVID-19. However, further high-quality clinical studies are required to confirm these results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.