Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37777512›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Phase information is conserved in sparse, synchronous population-rate-codes via phase-to-rate recoding.

Daniel Müller-Komorowska, Baris Kuru, Heinz Beck, Oliver Braganza

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniel Müller-Komorowska *Neural Coding and Brain Computing Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, 904-0495, Japan. daniel.mueller-komorowska@oist.jp.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2789-6068
Baris Kuru *Institute for Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Heinz BeckInstitute for Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany.
Oliver BraganzaInstitute for Experimental Epileptology and Cognition Research, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. oliver.braganza@ukbonn.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8508-1070

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neural computation is often traced in terms of either rate- or phase-codes. However, most circuit operations will simultaneously affect information across both coding schemes. It remains unclear how phase and rate coded information is transmitted, in the face of continuous modification at consecutive processing stages. Here, we study this question in the entorhinal cortex (EC)- dentate gyrus (DG)- CA3 system using three distinct computational models. We demonstrate that DG feedback inhibition leverages EC phase information to improve rate-coding, a computation we term phase-to-rate recoding. Our results suggest that it i) supports the conservation of phase information within sparse rate-codes and ii) enhances the efficiency of plasticity in downstream CA3 via increased synchrony. Given the ubiquity of both phase-coding and feedback circuits, our results raise the question whether phase-to-rate recoding is a recurring computational motif, which supports the generation of sparse, synchronous population-rate-codes in areas beyond the DG.

Indexed as

Dentate GyrusEntorhinal CortexHippocampusModels, Neurological

Identifiers

PMID37777512
PMCPMC10543394

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.