ReviewChinese medicine2023
Quality evaluation methods of chinese medicine based on scientific supervision: recent research progress and prospects.
Review in Chinese medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quality Evaluation Research Based on Functional Component Group and Quality Control Coefficient: A Case Study ofFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Intelligent Sensory Systems for Quality Evaluation of Traditional Chinese Medicine: A Review of Electronic Nose, Electronic Tongue, and Machine Vision Approaches.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Gegen Qinlian Decoction, a classic traditional Chinese medicine formula: a potential therapeutic strategy for ulcerative colitis and colorectal cancer.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Review
- Natural Products Modulate Plaque Macrophage Functional Programs in Atherosclerosis.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Holistic concept guided quality control of traditional Chinese medicines for optimizing bioavailability.Chinese medicine · 2025Review
- The Hepatoprotective Properties of the Revised Formulation of Dahuang Xiaoshi Tang, an Ancient Chinese Herbal Decoction, Are Probed by Integrated Metabolomics and Network Pharmacology.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Rising of natural therapies: Potential and challenges of traditional Chinese medicine in the management of gastrointestinal diseases.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Article
- Developing a value assessment index system of anti-tumour commercial Chinese polyherbal preparation in China: a modified Delphi study.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Article
- N1F(Improved-Nephropathy 1 Formula) Ameliorates Renal Interstitial Fibrosis via Inhibiting Extracellular Matrix Deposition and Regulating the FGF23/P38MAPK/Wnt Pathway.Cell biochemistry and biophysics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) is increasingly getting attention worldwide, as it has played a very satisfactory role in treating COVID-19 during these past 3 years, and the Chinese government highly supports the development of TCM. The therapeutical theory and efficacies of Chinese medicine (CM) involve the safety, effectiveness and quality evaluation of CM, which requires a standard sound system. Constructing a scientific and reasonable CM quality and safety evaluation system, and establishing high-quality standards are the key cores to promote the high-quality development of CM. Through the traditional quality control methods of CM, the progress of the Q-marker research and development system proposed in recent years, this paper integrated the research ideas and methods of CM quality control and identified effective quality parameters. In addition, we also applied these effective quality parameters to create a new and supervision model for the quality control of CM. In conclusion, this review summarizes the methods and standards of quality control research used in recent years, and provides references to the quality control of CM and how researchers conduct quality control experiments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.