Artificial intelligence in veterinary medicine requires regulation.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Artificial Intelligence in Veterinary Neurology: Comparative Insights From Human Medicine and Cross-Species Technology Transfer.Veterinary medicine and science · 2026
   Review
2. A systematic audit of transparency and validation disclosure in commercial veterinary artificial intelligence.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2026
   Article
3. ChatGPT in veterinary medicine: a practical guidance of generative artificial intelligence in clinics, education, and research.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024
   Review
4. In the 21st century, "AI" has a new meaning for veterinarians!The Canadian veterinary journal = La revue veterinaire canadienne · 2023
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as