Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37780613›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in endocrinology2023

Utility of a simplified [

Tanuj Puri, Michelle L Frost, Amelia E B Moore, Ananya Choudhury, Sobhan Vinjamuri, Abhishek Mahajan, Claire Fynbo, Marie Vrist, Jørn Theil, Kalevi Kairemo and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in endocrinology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. A mouse model of Jansen's metaphyseal chondrodysplasia for investigating disease mechanisms and candidate therapeutics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. American journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Tanuj PuriFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Michelle L FrostInstitute of Cancer Research Clinical Trials & Statistics Unit (ICR-CTSU), The Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, United Kingdom.
Amelia E B MooreDepartment of Cancer Imaging, and King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Ananya ChoudhuryFaculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, School of Medical Sciences, Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom.
Sobhan VinjamuriNuclear Medicine Department, Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Abhishek MahajanThe Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Claire FynboClinic of Nuclear Medicine, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Marie VristUniversity Clinic in Nephrology and Hypertension, Gødstrup Hospital, Herning, Denmark.
Jørn TheilDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Kalevi KairemoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States.
James WongDepartment of Anaesthesia, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Barts Health NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Habib ZaidiGeneva University Hospital, Division of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Geneva, Switzerland.
Mona-Elisabeth RevheimThe Intervention Centre, Oslo University Hospital, Norway Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Thomas J WernerDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Abass AlaviDepartment of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Gary J R CookDepartment of Cancer Imaging, and King's College London and Guy's and St Thomas' PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.
Glen M BlakeDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Department of Health
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We review the rationale, methodology, and clinical utility of quantitative [

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsSodium FluorideBone and BonesHumansPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographySodium Fluoride[18F]NaF[18F] sodium fluoridebone metabolic fluxclinical applicationsfuture developmentsKiPET-CTquantitative measurement of bone

Identifiers

PMID37780613
PMCPMC10534005

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.