ReviewHeliyon2023
A review of fake news detection approaches: A critical analysis of relevant studies and highlighting key challenges associated with the dataset, feature representation, and data fusion.
Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and validation of a tool for detecting misinformation risk in diet, nutrition, and health content (Diet-MisRAT).Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Evaluating reasoning large language models on rumor generation, detection, and debunking tasks.iScience · 2025Article
- Multimodal based Amharic fake news detection using CNN and attention-based BiLSTM.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
- pACP-HybDeep: predicting anticancer peptides using binary tree growth based transformer and structural feature encoding with deep-hybrid learning.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Determinants of multimodal fake review generation in China's E-commerce platforms.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- LLM-Enhanced multimodal detection of fake news.PloS one · 2024Article
- OLTW-TEC: online learning with sliding windows for text classifier ensembles.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Currently, social networks have become the main source to acquire news about current global affairs. However, fake news appears and spreads on social media daily. This disinformation has a negative influence on several domains, such as politics, the economy, and health. In addition, it further generates detriments to societal stability. Several studies have provided effective models for detecting fake news in social networks through a variety of methods; however, there are limitations. Furthermore, since it is a critical field, the accuracy of the detection models was found to be notably insufficient. Although many review articles have addressed the repercussions of fake news, most have focused on specific and recurring aspects of fake news detection models. For example, the majority of reviews have primarily focused on dividing datasets, features, and classifiers used in this field by type. The limitations of the datasets, their features, how these features are fused, and the impact of all these factors on detection models were not investigated, especially since most detection models were based on a supervised learning approach. This review article analyzes relevant studies for the few last years and highlights the challenges faced by fake news detection models and their impact on their performance. The investigation of fake news detection studies relied on the following aspects and their impact on detection accuracy, namely datasets, overfitting/underfitting, image-based features, feature vector representation, machine learning models, and data fusion. Based on the analysis of relevant studies, the review showed that these issues significantly affect the performance and accuracy of detection models. This review aims to provide room for other researchers in the future to improve fake news detection models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.