Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37780751›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

A review of fake news detection approaches: A critical analysis of relevant studies and highlighting key challenges associated with the dataset, feature representation, and data fusion.

Suhaib Kh Hamed, Mohd Juzaiddin Ab Aziz, Mohd Ridzwan Yaakub

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Suhaib Kh HamedCenter for Software Technology and Management (SOFTAM), Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohd Juzaiddin Ab AzizCenter for Software Technology and Management (SOFTAM), Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.
Mohd Ridzwan YaakubCenter for Artificial Intelligence Technology (CAIT), Faculty of Information Science and Technology, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi 43600, Selangor, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Currently, social networks have become the main source to acquire news about current global affairs. However, fake news appears and spreads on social media daily. This disinformation has a negative influence on several domains, such as politics, the economy, and health. In addition, it further generates detriments to societal stability. Several studies have provided effective models for detecting fake news in social networks through a variety of methods; however, there are limitations. Furthermore, since it is a critical field, the accuracy of the detection models was found to be notably insufficient. Although many review articles have addressed the repercussions of fake news, most have focused on specific and recurring aspects of fake news detection models. For example, the majority of reviews have primarily focused on dividing datasets, features, and classifiers used in this field by type. The limitations of the datasets, their features, how these features are fused, and the impact of all these factors on detection models were not investigated, especially since most detection models were based on a supervised learning approach. This review article analyzes relevant studies for the few last years and highlights the challenges faced by fake news detection models and their impact on their performance. The investigation of fake news detection studies relied on the following aspects and their impact on detection accuracy, namely datasets, overfitting/underfitting, image-based features, feature vector representation, machine learning models, and data fusion. Based on the analysis of relevant studies, the review showed that these issues significantly affect the performance and accuracy of detection models. This review aims to provide room for other researchers in the future to improve fake news detection models.

Indexed as

Data fusionDatasetFake news detectionFeature vectorImage featureOverfitting/underfitting

Identifiers

PMID37780751
PMCPMC10539669

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.