Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37788392›Full record

Trial reportThe Milbank quarterly2024

The Effect of the Earned Income Tax Credit on Physical and Mental health-Results from the Atlanta Paycheck Plus Experiment.

Peter Muennig, Daniel W Belsky, Daniel Malinsky, Kieu-Giang Nguyen, Zohn Rosen, Heidi Allen

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The Milbank quarterly, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter MuennigMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.ORCID 0000-0002-4234-0498
Daniel W BelskyMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.
Daniel MalinskyMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.
Kieu-Giang NguyenColumbia University.
Zohn RosenMailman School of Public Health, Columbia University.
Heidi AllenSchool of Social Work, Columbia University.
Columbia University · USButler University · US

Funding

Development CoreP2CHD058486 · NICHD · COLUMBIA UNIV NEW YORK MORNINGSIDE · PI Jennifer S Hirsch, Julien O Teitler · 2014 to 2026
$4.3M
The MyGoals for Healthy Aging Multi-Center Randomized Controlled TrialR01AG073402 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI Daniel Walker Belsky · 2022 to 2026
$3.6M
An Experimental Investigation into the Impact of Socioeconomic Context on Biological Markers of Aging, Health and MortalityR01AG054466 · NIA · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI ALLEN, HEIDI LYNN, MUENNIG, PETER A · 2016 to 2021
$3.0M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG054466NIA NIH HHS R01 AG073402NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD058486
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Policy Points The Paycheck Plus randomized controlled trial tested a fourfold increase in the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) for single adults without dependent children over 3 years in New York and Atlanta. In New York, the intervention improved economic, mental, and physical health outcomes. In Atlanta, it had no economic benefit or impact on physical health and may have worsened mental health. In Atlanta, tax filing and bonus receipt were lower than in the New York arm of the trial, which may explain the lack of economic benefits. Lower mental health scores in the treatment group were driven by disadvantaged men, and the study sample was in good mental health. CONTEXT: The Paycheck Plus experiment examined the effects of an enhanced Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) for single adults on economic and health outcomes in Atlanta, GA and New York City (NYC). The NYC study was completed two years prior to the Atlanta study and found mental and physical benefits for the subgroups that responded best to the economic incentives provided. In this article, we present the findings from the Atlanta study, in which the uptake of the treatment (tax filings and EITC bonus) were lower and economic and health benefits were not observed.

methodsPaycheck Plus Atlanta was an unblinded randomized controlled trial that assigned n = 3,971 participants to either the standard federal EITC (control group) or an EITC supplement of up to $2,000 (treatment group) for three tax years (2017-2019). Administrative data on employment and earnings were obtained from the Georgia Department of Labor and survey data were used to examine validated measures of health and well-being.

findingsIn Atlanta, the treatment group had significantly higher earnings in the first project year but did not have significantly higher cumulative earnings than the control group overall (mean difference = $1,812, 95% CI = -150, 3,774, p = 0.07). The treatment group also had significantly lower scores on two measures of mental health after the intervention was complete: the Patient Health Questionnaire 8 (mean difference = 0.19, 95% CI = 0.06, 0.32, p = 0.005) and the Kessler 6 (mean difference = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.03, 0.27, p = 0.012). Secondary analyses suggested these results were driven by disadvantaged men, but the study sample was in good mental health.

conclusionsThe EITC experiment in Atlanta was not associated with gains in earnings or improvements in physical or mental health.

Indexed as

Income TaxMental HealthAdultChildGeorgiaHumansIncomeMaleNew York CityTaxesUnited StatesEarned Income Tax Credithealth policyrandomized controlled trialssocial determinants of healthsocial policyupstream determinants of health

Identifiers

PMID37788392
PMCPMC10938929
OpenAlexW4387326794

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.