ArticleScientific reports2023
Differential gene expression analysis based on linear mixed model corrects false positive inflation for studying quantitative traits.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Identification of miRNA biomarkers for essential hypertension in small samples based on MPGAM.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Association Between Hematological Profiles and Whole-Blood Transcriptome Genes Identified Using Quantitative Analysis with Average Daily Gain and Feed Efficiency in Forage-Fed Beef Heifers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Human-specific protein-coding and lncRNA genes cast sex-biased genes in the brain and their relationships with brain diseases.Biology of sex differences · 2024Article
- TEMINET: A Co-Informative and Trustworthy Multi-Omics Integration Network for Diagnostic Prediction.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Differential gene expression (DGE) analysis has been widely employed to identify genes expressed differentially with respect to a trait of interest using RNA sequencing (RNA-Seq) data. Recent RNA-Seq data with large samples pose challenges to existing DGE methods, which were mainly developed for dichotomous traits and small sample sizes. Especially, existing DGE methods are likely to result in inflated false positive rates. To address this gap, we employed a linear mixed model (LMM) that has been widely used in genetic association studies for DGE analysis of quantitative traits. We first applied the LMM method to the discovery RNA-Seq data of dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) tissue (n = 632) with four continuous measures of Alzheimer's Disease (AD) cognitive and neuropathologic traits. The quantile-quantile plots of p-values showed that false positive rates were well calibrated by LMM, whereas other methods not accounting for sample-specific mixed effects led to serious inflation. LMM identified 37 potentially significant genes with differential expression in DLPFC for at least one of the AD traits, 17 of which were replicated in the additional RNA-Seq data of DLPFC, supplemental motor area, spinal cord, and muscle tissues. This application study showed not only well calibrated DGE results by LMM, but also possibly shared gene regulatory mechanisms of AD traits across different relevant tissues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.