ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2023
Effect of the tyrosine kinase inhibitors on the growth in children with Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a case-control study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- Predictors of Response to Imatinib Therapy and Long-Term Outcomes in Paediatric and Adolescent Patients With Chronic Myeloid Leukaemia.Cancer reports (Hoboken, N.J.) · 2026Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
26 authors at 20 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: First-generation ABL-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) imatinib is known to retard growth in children but it is not known if the second-generation ABL-targeted TKI dasatinib has the same effect. We aimed to determine the impact of the first- or second-generation TKI on the growth of children treated for Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph Methods: We evaluated the longitudinal growth changes in 140 children with Ph Findings: This study consisted only patients who have completed all treatment in continuous complete remission without major events, including 33 patients randomized to receive imatinib, 43 randomized to receive dasatinib, and 64 assigned to receive dasatinib. Similar degree of loss of height z scores from diagnosis to the end of therapy was observed for the 33 imatinib- and the 107 dasatinib-treated patients (median △ = -0.84 vs. -0.88, P = 0.41). Adjusting for height z score at diagnosis, puberty status, and sex, there was no significant difference in the longitudinal mean height z scores between patients treated with imatinib and those with dasatinib (0.08, 95% CI, -0.22 to 0.38, P = 0.60). The degree of loss of height z scores from diagnosis to end of therapy was significantly greater in the 140 TKI-treated patients than the 280 controls (median △ = -0.88 vs. -0.18, P < 0.001). The longitudinal mean height z scores in the TKI-treated patients were significantly lower than those of the controls (-0.84, 95% CI, -0.98 to -0.69; P < 0.001). Interpretation: These data suggest that dasatinib and imatinib have the similar adverse impact on the growth of children with Ph Funding: This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant 81670136 [JCai and JT]), the fourth round of Three-Year Public Health Action Plan (2015-2017; GWIV-25 [SS]), Shanghai Health Commission Clinical Research Project (202140161 [JCai]), the US National Cancer institute (CA21765 [C-H Pui]), and the American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities (CC, JJY, and C-HP). The content of this paper is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the US National Institutes of Health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.