Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37790508›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Evaluating functional brain organization in individuals and identifying contributions to network overlap.

Janine D Bijsterbosch, Seyedeh-Rezvan Farahibozorg, Matthew F Glasser, David Van Essen, Lawrence H Snyder, Mark W Woolrich, Stephen M Smith

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Janine D BijsterboschDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Seyedeh-Rezvan FarahibozorgWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN FMRIB), Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Matthew F GlasserDepartment of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
David Van EssenDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Lawrence H SnyderDepartment of Neuroscience, Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110, USA.
Mark W WoolrichOxford Centre for Human Brain Activity, Wellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging, Department of Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Stephen M SmithWellcome Centre for Integrative Neuroimaging (WIN FMRIB), Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Funding

RECONSTRUCTIONS AND REPRESENTATIONS OF CEREBRAL CORTEXR01MH060974 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 1999 to 2024
$12.7M
FUNCTIONAL CONNECTIVITY IN THE BRAIN: A NEW APPROACHR01MH102471 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI SNYDER, LAWRENCE H · 2014 to 2018
$1.9M
Understanding overlap in resting state fMRI networks at the single cell level: a cross-species approachR34NS118618 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BIJSTERBOSCH, JANINE DIANE, SNYDER, LAWRENCE H · 2020 to 2020
$709k
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060974NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH102471NINDS NIH HHS R34 NS118618Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual differences in the spatial organization of resting state networks have received increased attention in recent years. Measures of individual-specific spatial organization of brain networks and overlapping network organization have been linked to important behavioral and clinical traits and are therefore potential biomarker targets for personalized psychiatry approaches. To better understand individual-specific spatial brain organization, this paper addressed three key goals. First, we determined whether it is possible to reliably estimate weighted (non-binarized) resting state network maps using data from only a single individual, while also maintaining maximum spatial correspondence across individuals. Second, we determined the degree of spatial overlap between distinct networks, using test-retest and twin data. Third, we systematically tested multiple hypotheses (spatial mixing, temporal switching, and coupling) as candidate explanations for why networks overlap spatially. To estimate weighted network organization, we adopt the Probabilistic Functional Modes (PROFUMO) algorithm, which implements a Bayesian framework with hemodynamic and connectivity priors to supplement optimization for spatial sparsity/independence. Our findings showed that replicable individual-specific estimates of weighted resting state networks can be derived using high quality fMRI data within individual subjects. Network organization estimates using only data from each individual subject closely resembled group-informed network estimates (which was not explicitly modeled in our individual-specific analyses), suggesting that cross-subject correspondence was largely maintained. Furthermore, our results confirmed the presence of spatial overlap in network organization, which was replicable across sessions within individuals and in monozygotic twin pairs. Intriguingly, our findings provide evidence that network overlap is indicative of linear additive coupling. These results suggest that regions of network overlap concurrently process information from all contributing networks, potentially pointing to the role of overlapping network organization in the integration of information across multiple brain systems.

Identifiers

PMID37790508
PMCPMC10542549

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.