Evidence mapPaperPMID 37793753Full record

ReviewJournal of the American College of Cardiology2023

Childhood Screening for Familial Hypercholesterolemia: JACC Review Topic of the Week.

Samuel S Gidding

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samuel S GiddingDepartment of Genomic Health, Geisinger, Danville, Pennsylvania, USA. Electronic address: ssgidding@geisinger.edu.
Genomic Health (United States) · US

Funding

Collaborative Approach to Reach Everyone with Familial Hypercholesterolemia: CARE-FHR33HL161775 · GEISINGER CLINIC · 2025 to 2025
$727k
NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL161775NHLBI NIH HHS R61 HL161775
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Screening for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) in childhood remains controversial. Existing guidelines offer practitioners conflicting advice despite generally agreeing on the evidence and areas in which evidence is lacking, including a lack of long-term clinical trials demonstrating coronary event reduction as a result of screening and long-term data on statin side effects. A limitation of existing evidence-based frameworks is reliance on 1 evidence grading system to determine recommendations. However, rigorous evidence evaluation alternatives relevant to FH exist. FH is considered a tier 1 genetic condition, meaning that identification and treatment will improve health outcomes among those affected. Elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, the primary consequence of FH, can be considered causal for atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. Incorporating these concepts into existing evidence pathways allows the inclusion of surrogate clinical trial outcomes (low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction and atherosclerosis regression) and observational data on medication safety, strengthening the evidence for pediatric screening for FH.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase InhibitorsHyperlipoproteinemia Type IIChildCholesterolCholesterol, LDLHumansCholesterolCholesterol, LDLHydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase Inhibitorschildrenevidence evaluationfamilial hypercholesterolemiascreening

Identifiers

PMID37793753
PMCPMC11488674
OpenAlexW4387246211

What Socratic holds

Texttitle and abstract
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.