Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37795397›Full record

ArticleReports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology2023

Assessment of mouth opening before and after head and neck radiotherapy in patients with intraoral stents.

Mailon Cury Carneiro, Gabriela Moura Chicrala, Vitor Mota Freitas, Guilherme Hideki de Lima Toyoshima, Paulo Sérgio da Silva Santos

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Biomedicines · 2026
    Article
  3. Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Mailon Cury CarneiroDepartment of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology, and Radiology; Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Gabriela Moura ChicralaDepartment of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology, and Radiology; Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Vitor Mota FreitasBauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Guilherme Hideki de Lima ToyoshimaBauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Paulo Sérgio da Silva SantosDepartment of Surgery, Stomatology, Pathology, and Radiology; Bauru School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, Bauru, Brazil.
Stomatology Hospital · CNUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: We evaluated the evolution of mouth opening before and after radiotherapy of the head and neck in patients using intraoral stents. Materials and methods: Twenty-one patients with head and neck cancer who were indicated for radiotherapy participated in this study. Maximum interincisal opening measurements were performed before and after radiotherapy. Paired analyses of the pre- and post-radiotherapy groups were performed using paired samples t-tests and correlation analyses using Spearman's correlation test, with p < 0.05 considered statistically significant. Results: Paired analyses of the pre- and post-radiotherapy groups revealed a statistically significant reduction in post-radiotherapy maximum interincisal opening (p < 0.001). However, only four individuals were diagnosed with trismus after radiotherapy. Regarding the correlation tests, no statistically significant differences were observed between the differences in pre- and post-radiotherapy maximum interincisal opening values and the study variables. Conclusion: The use of prosthetic devices during head and neck radiotherapy can reduce radiation doses in areas of no interest, thereby preventing the acute and late toxicities associated with cancer therapy.

Indexed as

adverse effectshead and neck neoplasmsintensity-modulatedintraoral stentsradiotherapytrismus

Identifiers

PMID37795397
PMCPMC10547412
OpenAlexW4387170900

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.