Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37797435›Full record

SynthesisNeuroImage. Clinical2023

fMRI connectivity as a biomarker of antipsychotic treatment response: A systematic review.

L S Dominicus, L van Rijn, J van der A, R van der Spek, D Podzimek, M Begemann, L de Haan, M van der Pluijm, W M Otte, W Cahn and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in NeuroImage. Clinical, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

L S DominicusDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: l.s.dominicus-2@umcutrecht.nl.
L van RijnDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J van der ADepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
R van der SpekDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
D PodzimekDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M BegemannDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
L de HaanDepartment Early Psychosis, Academical Medical Centre of the University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
M van der PluijmDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Psychiatry, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
W M OtteDepartment of Child Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, and Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
W CahnDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
C H RöderDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
H G SchnackDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
E van DellenDepartment of Psychiatry, Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands; Department of Intensive Care Medicine and UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLAmsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity of Amsterdam · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAntipsychotic drugs are the first-choice therapy for psychotic episodes, but antipsychotic treatment response (AP-R) is unpredictable and only becomes clear after weeks of therapy. A biomarker for AP-R is currently unavailable. We reviewed the evidence for the hypothesis that functional magnetic resonance imaging functional connectivity (fMRI-FC) is a predictor of AP-R or could serve as a biomarker for AP-R in psychosis.

methodA systematic review of longitudinal fMRI studies examining the predictive performance and relationship between FC and AP-R was performed following PRISMA guidelines. Technical and clinical aspects were critically assessed for the retrieved studies. We addressed three questions: Q1) is baseline fMRI-FC related to subsequent AP-R; Q2) is AP-R related to a change in fMRI-FC; and Q3) can baseline fMRI-FC predict subsequent AP-R?

resultsIn total, 28 articles were included. Most studies were of good quality. fMRI-FC analysis pipelines included seed-based-, independent component- / canonical correlation analysis, network-based statistics, and graph-theoretical approaches. We found high heterogeneity in methodological approaches and results. For Q1 (N = 17) and Q2 (N = 18), the most consistent evidence was found for FC between the striatum and ventral attention network as a potential biomarker of AP-R. For Q3 (N = 9) accuracy's varied form 50 till 93%, and prediction models were based on FC between various brain regions.

conclusionThe current fMRI-FC literature on AP-R is hampered by heterogeneity of methodological approaches. Methodological uniformity and further improvement of the reliability and validity of fMRI connectivity analysis is needed before fMRI-FC analysis can have a place in clinical applications of antipsychotic treatment.

Indexed as

Antipsychotic AgentsBiomarkersBrainBrain MappingHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingReproducibility of ResultsAntipsychotic AgentsBiomarkersAntipsychotic responsefMRIFunctional connectivityPredictionPsychosis

Identifiers

PMID37797435
PMCPMC10568423
OpenAlexW4386986975

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.