Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37801187›Full record

ReviewCurrent oncology reports2023

Lymph Node Dissection in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Current Status and Future Perspectives.

Andrzej Dłubak, Jakub Karwacki, Katarzyna Logoń, Paulina Tomecka, Kinga Brawańska, Wojciech Krajewski, Tomasz Szydełko, Bartosz Małkiewicz

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current oncology reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07321210 (Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Radical Nephroureterectomy With Versus Without Template Lymph Node Dissection in High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07321210 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Clinical Efficacy and Safety of Radical Nephroureterectomy With Versus Without Template Lymph Node Dissection in High-Risk Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Multicenter, Prospective, Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorTianjin Medical University Second HospitalRan2025 to 2032Enrolled150ConditionsUpper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma, Lymph Node DissectionArmsTemplate Lymph Node Dissection, Selective Lymph Node Resection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrzej DłubakDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
Jakub KarwackiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
Katarzyna LogońDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-9038-2940
Paulina TomeckaDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.
Kinga BrawańskaDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0009-0003-7681-9805
Wojciech KrajewskiDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1727-2283
Tomasz SzydełkoDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-1360-0422
Bartosz MałkiewiczDepartment of Minimally Invasive and Robotic Urology, University Center of Excellence in Urology, Wroclaw Medical University, 50-556, Wroclaw, Poland. bartosz.malkiewicz@umw.edu.pl.ORCID 0000-0002-5933-3753
Wroclaw Medical University · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewThis narrative review aims to evaluate the role of lymph node dissection (LND) in upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) and its implications for staging and management outcomes, as well as future perspectives. RECENT

findingsMultiple studies have demonstrated the limitations of conventional imaging techniques in accurately localizing lymph node metastasis (LNM) in UTUC. While 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) shows promise for preoperative LNM detection, its specificity is low. Alternative methods such as choline PET/CT and sentinel lymph node detection are under consideration but require further investigation. Additionally, various preoperative factors associated with LNM hold potential for predicting nodal involvement, thereby improving nodal staging and oncologic outcomes of LND. Several surgical approaches, including segmental ureterectomy and robot-assisted nephroureterectomy, provide a possibility for LND, while minimizing morbidity. LND remains the primary nodal staging tool for UTUC, but its therapeutic benefit is still uncertain. Advances in imaging techniques and preoperative risk assessment show promise in improving LNM detection. Further research and multi-center studies are needed to comprehensively assess the advantages and limitations of LND in UTUC, as well as the long-term outcomes of alternative staging and treatment strategies.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Transitional CellUrinary Bladder NeoplasmsHumansLymphatic MetastasisLymph Node ExcisionLymph NodesNeoplasm StagingPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyLymphadenectomyLymph nodesOncologic stagingUpper tract urothelial carcinomaUrologic malignancies

Identifiers

PMID37801187
PMCPMC10640513
OpenAlexW4387392789

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.