Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37803246›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2024

The role of [

Caner Civan, Serkan Kuyumcu, Duygu Has Simsek, Oner Sanli, Emine Goknur Isik, Zeynep Gozde Ozkan, Ozge Hurdogan, Yasemin Sanli

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Head-to-head comparative study of [Frontiers in oncology · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. SNMMI/EANM/ACNM Procedure Standard/Procedure Guideline on the Use of Molecular Imaging for Renal Mass Characterization.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2025
    Guideline
  3. Trial
  4. Head-to-head comparison ofEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Is There a Role for FAPI PET in Urological Cancers?Molecular diagnosis & therapy · 2024
    Review
  11. Efficacy ofJapanese journal of radiology · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. FAPI PET/CT: a new kid on the block for RCC.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caner CivanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey. dr.canercivan@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0003-4745-3501
Serkan KuyumcuDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1158-5361
Duygu Has SimsekDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-6945-2003
Oner SanliDepartment of Urology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-5801-6898
Emine Goknur IsikDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-3786-8052
Zeynep Gozde OzkanDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0003-0360-358X
Ozge HurdoganDepartment of Pathology, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0001-8352-8158
Yasemin SanliDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Istanbul Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University, 34093, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.ORCID 0000-0002-1267-2379
Istanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeWe aimed to investigate the role of [

methodsTwenty patients with a suspicious lesion considered primary renal malignancy or a history of RCC were included in our study. Two patients were excluded from further analyses due to other confirmed malignancies. Six patients were newly diagnosed, while the indication of 12 patients was restaging. All patients underwent [

resultsWe detected 90 lesions in 18 patients with varying FAPI and FDG uptake values on both PET/CT. The median TBR of FAPI-PET/CT of all lesions was higher than TBR of FDG-PET/CT with statistically significance (5.6 vs. 2.1, p < 0.001). In primary and recurrent lesions, the median SUVmax, TBR, and tumor volume on FAPI-PET/CT were higher than FDG-PET/CT. The median SUVmax of lung lesions on FAPI-PET/CT was statistical significantly higher than FDG-SUVmax (3.8 vs. 1.8, p = 0.02). The median of FAPI-SUVmax on primary lesions was lower in the early stage based on TNM compared to the advanced stage. FAPI-SUVmax in 49% of all lesions were SUVmax ≥ 6, and 13% were SUVmax ≥ 10. In patient-based analyses, seven patients (39%) had at least one lesion with FAPI-SUVmax ≥ 10; 12 patients (67%) had at least one lesion with FAPI-SUVmax ≥ 6.

conclusionThis study showed the potential utility of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI-04 PET/CT showing promising results in RCC. We have presumed that FAPI-PET/CT may be performed for complementary imaging modality providing prognosis and possibility of theranostic application in selected patients.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsQuinolinesFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gallium RadioisotopesHumansPositron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography68Ga-FAPIFluorodeoxyglucose F18Gallium RadioisotopesQuinolinesFAPIPET/CTRCCRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID37803246
OpenAlexW4387394086

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.