Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37809088›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in immunology2023

cGAS-STING pathway in ischemia-reperfusion injury: a potential target to improve transplantation outcomes.

Zijian Chen, Yangqi Liu, Zeying Lin, Weizhe Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Zijian ChenDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Yangqi LiuDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Zeying LinDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Weizhe HuangDepartment of Cardiothoracic Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College, Shantou, China.
Second Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College · CNShantou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transplantation is an important life-saving therapeutic choice for patients with organ or tissue failure once all other treatment options are exhausted. However, most allografts become damaged over an extended period, and post-transplantation survival is limited. Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) tends to be associated with a poor prognosis; resultant severe primary graft dysfunction is the main cause of transplant failure. Targeting the cGAS-STING pathway has recently been shown to be an effective approach for improving transplantation outcomes, when activated or inhibited cGAS-STING pathway, IRI can be alleviated by regulating inflammatory response and programmed cell death. Thus, continuing efforts to develop selective agonists and antagonists may bring great hopes to post-transplant patient. In this mini-review, we reviewed the role of the cGAS-STING pathway in transplantation, and summarized the crosstalk between this pathway and inflammatory response and programmed cell death during IRI, aiming to provide novel insights into the development of therapies to improve patient outcome after transplantation.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationReperfusion InjuryApoptosisHumansNucleotidyltransferasesNucleotidyltransferasesallograftscGAS-STINGinflammationischemia-reperfusion injuryprogrammed cell deathtransplantation

Identifiers

PMID37809088
PMCPMC10552181
OpenAlexW4386917271

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.