Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37812955›Full record

Trial reportClinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil)2023

Stroke in children and adolescents: Analysis of electrophysiological and behavioral assessment findings of auditory processing.

Andréia Rodrigues Parnoff Stadulni, Pricila Sleifer, Amanda Zanatta Berticelli, Rudimar Riesgo, Carolina Nunes Rocha-Muniz, Eliane Schochat

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinics (Sao Paulo, Brazil), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 84% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Characteristics of auditory event-related potential and prediction ofQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andréia Rodrigues Parnoff StadulniDepartment of Physiotherapy, Speech Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil. Electronic address: deiafono@hotmail.com.
Pricila SleiferDepartment of Health and Human Communication, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Amanda Zanatta BerticelliGraduate Program in Child and Adolescent Health, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Rudimar RiesgoGraduate Program in Child and Adolescent Health, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil; Hospital de Clínicas (HCPA), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Carolina Nunes Rocha-MunizDepartment of Physiotherapy, Speech Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Eliane SchochatDepartment of Physiotherapy, Speech Therapy and Occupational Therapy, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (USP), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThis study aimed to analyze the auditory processing behavior of children and adolescents diagnosed with stroke and compare it with that of typically developing individuals.

methodsThis was an analytical cross-sectional study involving 48 participants aged between 7 and 17 years with adequate schooling for age and grade, allocated equally to two groups: Stroke (SG) and Control Groups (CG). For the SG, cases identified between 2003 and 2018 were considered. In the CG, school-aged participants with typical development were randomized. After screening for differential audiological assessment and confirmation of auditory pathway integrity at the brainstem level, binaural analyses of the auditory processing behavior were conducted using the Dichotic Digit Test (DDT), Frequency Pattern Test (FPT), and electrophysiological assessment (P300). The Shapiro-Wilk test for normality was conducted, followed by the T and Mann-Whitney tests, with a 95 % confidence level and significance offset at p < 0.05, using the SPSS software (IBM®, v. 22.)

resultsThe CG performed better in terms of auditory processing. These differences were significant (p < 0.0001) for the binaural integration of DDT, FPT humming and Labeling, and P300 latency. The P300 results were similar; however, with a greater amplitude in the SG.

conclusionThis study showed that children and adolescents with stroke performed worse in electrophysiological and behavioral tests of auditory processing assessed using the auditory evoked potentials. These data reinforce the hypothesis that stroke-related lesions compromise the neural mechanisms underlying auditory processing.

Indexed as

Behavior Rating ScaleStrokeAdolescentAuditory PerceptionChildCross-Sectional StudiesEvoked Potentials, AuditoryEvoked Potentials, Auditory, Brain StemHumansAdolescentsAuditory evoked potentialsAuditory processing disordersChildrenHearingStroke

Identifiers

PMID37812955
PMCPMC10569949
OpenAlexW4387421119

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.