Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37814223›Full record

SynthesisThe journal of headache and pain2023

European Headache Federation (EHF) critical reappraisal and meta-analysis of oral drugs in migraine prevention - part 3: topiramate.

Bianca Raffaelli, David García-Azorín, Deirdre M Boucherie, Faisal Mohammad Amin, Christina I Deligianni, Raquel Gil-Gouveia, Sarah Kirsh, Christian Lampl, Simona Sacco, Derya Uluduz and 5 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The journal of headache and pain, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Health equity, care access and quality in headache - part 2.The journal of headache and pain · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 12 institutions in 10 countries.

Bianca Raffaelli *Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
David García-Azorín *Headache Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
Deirdre M Boucherie *Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Erasmus MC Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Faisal Mohammad AminDepartment of Neurology, Danish Headache Center, Copenhagen University Hospital - Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Christina I DeligianniDepartment of Neurology, Athens Naval Hospital, Athens, Greece.
Raquel Gil-GouveiaHospital da Luz Headache Center, Neurology Department, Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Sarah KirshDepartment of Anesthesia and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Christian LamplDepartment of Neurology and Stroke Unit, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brüder Linz, Linz, Austria.
Simona SaccoDepartment of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.
Derya UluduzDepartment of Neurology Istanbul Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty, Istanbul, Turkey.
Jan VersijptDepartment of Neurology, Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel (UZ Brussel), Brussels, Belgium.
Antoinette MaassenVanDenBrink *Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Vascular Medicine and Pharmacology, Erasmus MC Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Dena Zeraatkar *Department of Anesthesia and Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence and Impact, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
Margarita Sanchez-Del-Rio *Department of Neurology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
Uwe Reuter *Department of Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. uwe.reuter@charite.de.
Erasmus MC · NLImpact · CAAthens Naval & Veterans Hospital · GRCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DEClinica Universidad de Navarra · ESConvent Hospital of the Brothers of Saint John of God · ATHospital Clínico Universitario de Valladolid · ESRigshospitalet · DKUniversidade Católica Portuguesa · PTUniversitair Ziekenhuis Brussel · BEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEUniversity of L'Aquila · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTopiramate is a repurposed first-line treatment for migraine prophylaxis. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to critically re-appraise the existing evidence supporting the efficacy and tolerability of topiramate.

methodsA systematic search in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov was performed for trials of pharmacological treatment in migraine prophylaxis as of August 13, 2022, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA). Randomized controlled trials in adult patients that used topiramate for the prophylactic treatment of migraine, with placebo as active comparator, were included. Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved studies and extracted all data. Outcomes of interest were the 50% responder rates, the reduction in monthly migraine days, and adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. Results were pooled and meta-analyzed, with sensitivity analysis based on the risk of bias of the studies, the monthly migraine days at baseline, and the previous use of other prophylactic treatments. Certainty evidence was judged according to the GRADE framework.

resultsEight out of 10,826 studies fulfilled the inclusion/exclusion criteria, accounting for 2,610 randomized patients. Six studies included patients with episodic migraine and two with chronic migraine. Topiramate dose ranged from 50 to 200 mg/day, and all studies included a placebo arm. There was a high certainty that topiramate: 1) increased the proportion of patients who achieved a 50% responder rate in monthly migraine days, compared to placebo [relative risk: 1.61 (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.29-2.01); absolute risk difference: 168 more per 1,000 (95% CI: 80 to 278 more)]; 2) was associated with 0.99 (95% CI: 1.41-0.58) fewer migraine days than placebo; 3) and had a higher proportion of patients with adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation [absolute risk difference 80 patients more per 1,000 (95% CI: 20 to 140 more patients)].

conclusionsThere is high-quality evidence of the efficacy of topiramate in the prophylaxis of migraine, albeit its use poses a risk of adverse events that may lead to treatment discontinuation, with a negative effect on patient satisfaction and adherence to care.

Indexed as

Migraine DisordersAdultHeadacheHumansPatient SatisfactionTopiramateTranscription FactorsEHF protein, humanTopiramateTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID37814223
PMCPMC10563338
OpenAlexW4387445228

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.