ArticleJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology2023
Alteration of serum bile acids in non-small cell lung cancer identified by a validated LC-MS/MS method.
Article in Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Dynamic Gut Microbiota: Monitoring Alterations During Lung Cancer Progression for Diagnosis and Precision Medicine.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Bile acid metabolism and invasion-related genes as therapeutic monitoring biomarkers in non-small cell lung cancer.Discover oncology · 2025Article
- Development of a reliable risk prognostic model for lung adenocarcinoma based on the genes related to endotheliocyte senescence.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Metabolomics for early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: diagnostic biomarker screening.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Respiratory diseases and the gut microbiota: an updated review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundBile acids (BA) are important metabolites and serve as signaling molecules, which are involve in multiple cancer-related signaling pathways.
methodsA validated LC-MS/MS approach was applied in a case-control study with 220 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and 244 matched healthy controls. The concentrations of seven common types of BAs in serum were determined and compared. Subgroup analyses based on demographic factor, lifestyle, pathologic types and tumor stage were conducted. Machine learning analysis was performed for NSCLC classification.
resultsSerum levels of primary BAs, including cholic acid (CA), taurocholic acid (TCA) and glycocholic acid (GCA), were upregulated, while lithocholic acid (LCA), a type of secondary BA, was downregulated in NSCLC patients compared with healthy controls in overall analysis. Higher level of chenodeoxycholic acid (CDCA) and lower level of ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) were observed in female, elder, overweight patients, as well as patients without alcohol use in comparison with controls. CDCA and CA levels were higher only in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), and UDCA and DCA levels were lower only in squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC), while the concentrations of TCA, GCA, and LCA were altered prevalently in LUAD and LUSC patients. For discrimination of NSCLC from healthy people, the area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve of the models through support vector machine (SVM) approach was 0.91 (95% CI 0.88-0.94) in the training set and 0.84 (95% CI 0.78-0.91) in the validation set, respectively.
conclusionsSerum BAs were altered in NSCLC patients compared with controls, among which primary BAs were elevated and secondary BAs were decreased. Moreover, distinct patterns of BA alterations were revealed between LUAD patients and LUSC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.