Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37816706›Full record

ArticleTranslational psychiatry2023

Predicting individual cases of major adolescent psychiatric conditions with artificial intelligence.

Nina de Lacy, Michael J Ramshaw, Elizabeth McCauley, Kathleen F Kerr, Joan Kaufman, J Nathan Kutz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Responsible artificial intelligence integration framework for psychiatric guidelines.The international journal of neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Artificial Intelligence-Empowered Multimodal Learning in Psychiatry: A Scoping Review.Biological psychiatry. Cognitive neuroscience and neuroimaging · 2026
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Dealing with overwhelming life situations - young people's experiences of becoming depressed.Scandinavian journal of child and adolescent psychiatry and psychology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nina de LacyHuntsman Mental Health Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, 84103, USA. nina.delacy@utah.edu.
Michael J RamshawHuntsman Mental Health Institute, Salt Lake City, UT, 84103, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-8800-2817
Elizabeth McCauleyDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
Kathleen F KerrDepartment of Biostatistics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6438-9583
Joan KaufmanKSADS-COMP, LLC, Madison, WI, USA.
J Nathan KutzDepartment of Applied Mathematics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.

Funding

Deep machine learning to delineate trajectories of vulnerability and transition to mental illness in youthK99MH118359 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI DE LACY, NINA · 2019 to 2020
$314k
NIMH NIH HHS K99 MH118359
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three-quarters of lifetime mental illness occurs by the age of 24, but relatively little is known about how to robustly identify youth at risk to target intervention efforts known to improve outcomes. Barriers to knowledge have included obtaining robust predictions while simultaneously analyzing large numbers of different types of candidate predictors. In a new, large, transdiagnostic youth sample and multidomain high-dimension data, we used 160 candidate predictors encompassing neural, prenatal, developmental, physiologic, sociocultural, environmental, emotional and cognitive features and leveraged three different machine learning algorithms optimized with a novel artificial intelligence meta-learning technique to predict individual cases of anxiety, depression, attention deficit, disruptive behaviors and post-traumatic stress. Our models tested well in unseen, held-out data (AUC ≥ 0.94). By utilizing a large-scale design and advanced computational approaches, we were able to compare the relative predictive ability of neural versus psychosocial features in a principled manner and found that psychosocial features consistently outperformed neural metrics in their relative ability to deliver robust predictions of individual cases. We found that deep learning with artificial neural networks and tree-based learning with XGBoost outperformed logistic regression with ElasticNet, supporting the conceptualization of mental illnesses as multifactorial disease processes with non-linear relationships among predictors that can be robustly modeled with computational psychiatry techniques. To our knowledge, this is the first study to test the relative predictive ability of these gold-standard algorithms from different classes across multiple mental health conditions in youth within the same study design in multidomain data utilizing >100 candidate predictors. Further research is suggested to explore these findings in longitudinal data and validate results in an external dataset.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityAdolescentAlgorithmsHumansMachine LearningNeural Networks, Computer

Identifiers

PMID37816706
PMCPMC10564881

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.