ArticleScientific reports2023
Shifts of the soil microbiome composition induced by plant-plant interactions under increasing cover crop densities and diversities.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genome-Resolved Delineation of Three Novel EndophyticMicroorganisms · 2026Article
- Ecological Impacts of Sunflowers on Soil Microbial Communities: Insights from Full-Length 16S rRNA Sequencing.Current microbiology · 2025Article
- Nutrient uptake and rhizosphere microbial community as related to yield advantage in broomcorn millet‒alfalfa intercropping under different row configurations.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Soil microbiome transplantation to enhance the drought response ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Article
- Update of the list of qualified presumption of safety (QPS) recommended microbiological agents intentionally added to food or feed as notified to EFSA 19: Suitability of taxonomic units notified to EFSA until September 2023.EFSA journal. European Food Safety Authority · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Interspecific and intraspecific competition and facilitation have been a focus of study in plant-plant interactions, but their influence on plant recruitment of soil microbes is unknown. In this greenhouse microcosm experiment, three cover crops (alfalfa, brassica, and fescue) were grown alone, in paired mixtures, and all together under different densities. For all monoculture trials, total pot biomass increased as density increased. Monoculture plantings of brassica were associated with the bacteria Azospirillum spp., fescue with Ensifer adhaerens, and alfalfa with both bacterial taxa. In the polycultures of cover crops, for all plant mixtures, total above-ground alfalfa biomass increased with density, and total above ground brassica biomass remained unchanged. For each plant mixture, differential abundances highlighted bacterial taxa which had not been previously identified in monocultures. For instance, mixtures of all three plants showed an increase in abundance of Planctomyces sp. SH-PL14 and Sandaracinus amylolyticus which were not represented in the monocultures. Facilitation was best supported for the alfalfa-fescue interaction as the total above ground biomass was the highest of any mixture. Additionally, the bulk soil microbiome that correlated with increasing plant densities showed increases in plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria such as Achromobacter xylosoxidans, Stentotrophomonas spp., and Azospirillum sp. In contrast, Agrobacterium tumefaciens, a previously known generalist phytopathogen, also increased with alfalfa-fescue plant densities. This could suggest a strategy by which, after facilitation, a plant neighbor could culture a pathogen that could be more detrimental to the other.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.