Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37818182›Full record

ArticleWomen's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)2023

Use of Contraceptive Methods Among Women in the General Population and Female Gynecologists in Spain: the ELEGIAN Survey.

Josep Perelló-Capo, José C Quílez-Conde, José Gutiérrez-Alés, Paloma Lobo-Abascal, Inmaculada Parra-Ribes, Ignacio Cristóbal-García, Mercedes Andeyro-García, Mercedes Herrero-Conde, Joan Rius-Tarruella, Joaquim Calaf-Alsina

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 76% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Josep Perelló-CapoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
José C Quílez-CondeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Basurto, Bilbao, Spain.
José Gutiérrez-AlésContraception and Sexual and Reproductive Health, Universidad de Alcalá (UAH), Madrid, Spain.
Paloma Lobo-AbascalDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Sofía, San Sebastián de los Reyes, Madrid, Spain.
Inmaculada Parra-RibesSueca Sexual and Reproductive Health Unit, La Ribera Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Conselleria de Sanitat Universal i Salut Pública, Valencia, Spain.
Ignacio Cristóbal-GarcíaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes Andeyro-GarcíaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital General de Villalba, Madrid, Spain.
Mercedes Herrero-CondeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gine4, HM Hospitals, Madrid, Spain.
Joan Rius-TarruellaMedical Department, Bayer Hispania S.L., Barcelona, Spain.
Joaquim Calaf-AlsinaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain.
Hospital de Sant Pau · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The contraceptive preferences of obstetricians and gynecologists (OB/GYNs) are thought to influence the contraceptive counseling they provide. The purpose of this study was to assess contraceptive preferences of OB/GYNs and women in the general population (WGP) in the current Spanish contraceptive scenario. Materials and Methods: Anonymous online survey of 100 OB/GYNs and 1,217 WGP aged 23-49 years. Results: WGP were younger (35.3 ± 7.3 vs. 37.9 ± 6.2 years, respectively) and less likely to have stable partners (64.7% vs. 84.0%) and children (49.1% vs. 62.0%) (all Conclusions: Our study reveals differences between female OB/GYNs and WGP in contraceptive methods use and rating. The use of LNG-IUDs was much higher among OB/GYNs.

Indexed as

consumer behaviorcontraceptioncontraceptive behaviorcontraceptive prevalence surveylong-acting reversible contraceptionpatient preference

Identifiers

PMID37818182
PMCPMC10561741
OpenAlexW4387495848

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.